[問題] 新GRE閱讀邏輯10套

看板GRE (GRE入學考試)作者 (0分)時間12年前 (2012/05/08 17:57), 編輯推噓1(107)
留言8則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
最近在做新GRE閱讀邏輯10套 練習下來發現有一些問題 希望大家可以幫忙解答一下 謝謝 A thorough search of Edgar Allan Poe's correspondence has turned up not a single letter in which he mentions his reputed morphine addiction. On the basis of this evidence it is safe to say that Poe's reputation for having been a morphine addict is undeserved and that reports of his supposed addiction are untrue. 想問請問一下文中的correspondence 是要當作通信 通信情況 還是做信件解釋 另外turn up not a single letter mentions 是"沒有一封信(letter)當中提到" 或者是隻字未提的意思 letter 做字母解釋 Which of the following is assumed by the argument above? (A) Reports claiming that Poe was addicted to mor- phine did not begin to circulate until after his death. (B) None of the reports of Poe's supposed morphine addiction can be traced to individuals who actu- ally knew Poe. (C) Poe's income from writing would not have been sufficient to support a morphine addiction. (D) Poe would have been unable to carry on an extensive correspondence while under the influence of morphine. (E) Fear of the consequences would not have pre- vented Poe from indicating in his correspon- dence that he was addicted to morphine. 答案是 E 用刪去法的方式似乎是E比較合理 可是整句話解釋起來有點奇怪 希望大家可以幫忙解答一下 另外如果有人想要一起討論的話 可以站內信 以後用MSN 或skype 討論相關的題目 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.116.253.121

05/10 03:59, , 1F
correspondence是指信件往來,letter這邊可以雙關
05/10 03:59, 1F

05/10 04:00, , 2F
問預設就是問什麼前提要成立才能得到文中的結論
05/10 04:00, 2F

05/10 04:02, , 3F
結論是因為書信往來中沒談到沒有毒癮推斷毒癮的傳聞
05/10 04:02, 3F

05/10 04:06, , 4F
A-D即使假定為真,結論也不一定為真
05/10 04:06, 4F

05/10 04:08, , 5F
只有假定E為真,毒癮傳聞為假的推論才能必為真
05/10 04:08, 5F

05/10 04:16, , 6F
不過嚴格說起來即使E為真,結論也未必為真,因為這非
05/10 04:16, 6F

05/10 04:17, , 7F
演繹論證,所以E只是可信度最高的選項。
05/10 04:17, 7F

05/10 22:53, , 8F
樓上的大大!!謝謝你!!
05/10 22:53, 8F
文章代碼(AID): #1FgEt-py (GRE)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1FgEt-py (GRE)