Re: [問題] 陳聖元填空p.36,section7,#2

看板GRE (GRE入學考試)作者 (書蟲一枚)時間13年前 (2012/08/19 02:11), 編輯推噓1(102)
留言3則, 1人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
※ 引述《rosyhope (Sunrising)》之銘言: : 2.Sponsors of the bill were ______ because there : was no opposition to it within the legislature : until after the measure had been signed into law. : 本句的until應該是單獨用法,表示before的意思。 : 可是如果將本句的until解釋為before, : 不就是把before after並列嗎怎麼有點矛盾??@@ : 2.Sponsors of the bill were ______ because there : was no opposition to it within the legislature : until [after {[the measure] had been signed into law}]. 嗯~應該是直接回答第二個問題, 這個問題會說時態有變化,是因為所指的主詞不同 題目問的是人, 而[after {[the measure] had been signed into law}]這個子句 ,講的是the measure after是指{[the measure] had been signed into law}] 而不是與until連用 所以until就直接照題譯一樣,翻成[直到]就可以了 使用until的重點在於強調過去的持續狀態 不然就像你講的,用before after很奇怪(又不是全能住宅改造王= =) 而且也無法表達出整個議程都沒有反對者的持續狀態 僅供參考 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.121.148.98

08/19 23:18, , 1F
感謝原po的分享!!
08/19 23:18, 1F

08/19 23:20, , 2F
不過到底議案通過之後還有沒有反對意見
08/19 23:20, 2F

08/19 23:21, , 3F
這部分的時態還是沒有很懂@@
08/19 23:21, 3F
文章代碼(AID): #1GBzgvkD (GRE)
文章代碼(AID): #1GBzgvkD (GRE)