Re: [問題] 36套 Exercise_18 第四題
※ 引述《chen52 (123)》之銘言:
: 36套 Exercise 18 第二篇
: A long-held view of the history of English colonies that became
: the United States has been that England's policy toward these colonies
: before 1763 was dictated by commercial interests and that a change to
: a more imperial policy , dominated by expansionis~~~~
: #4 The passage can best be described as a
: (A) survey of the inadequcies of a conventional viewpoint
: (B) reconciliation @#@#
: (C) summary and evaluation of a recent study
: (D) defense of a new theis from anticipated objections
: (E) review of the subtle distinctions between apparently similar views
: (B)(D)(E) 都可以用POE 刪掉
: @@ 但是(A) (C) 這兩個答案~~~
: (A) 有不好嗎~~
: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~答案是(C)
: 有高手可以幫我解釋一下嗎~~~
: 3q3q
反過來想 有A-E 的標題你覺得會看到甚麼?
先只看動作 至於對象是 recent study 還是 conventional viewpoint
應該可以自己判斷
A: survey of the inadequcies 複數字
你應該看到一篇有條列數點 內容的文章
B: reconciliation
就要說明兩個論點其實不互相衝突
C: summary and evaluation
這樣說這篇文章有兩節 先整理論述 後評判
D: defense
這樣的寫法一定要 舉出anticipated objections 之後一一反駁
E: review of the subtle distinctions
這樣會是比較類的文章
要不是 A 1.
2.
3.
B 1.
2.
3.
就是 1. A B
2. A B
3. A B
______________________________
言歸正傳
本文核心是?
A long-held view 當然不是這一句
In a recent study, Stephen Saunders
Webb has presented a formidable challenge to this view.
其實答案就出來了
formidable
是作者的態度啦
而且好像不太買帳
所以注意之後所有的內容都清楚標示
According to Webb,
He sees
in Webb‘s view,
According to Webb,
Webb argues that
It was, according to Webb,
Webb‘s study illuminates the
意思是這都是 Webb 一個人說的喔
作者自己沒有幫忙舉出其他例子來支持顯然大事不妙
果然作者最後還是開始批評了
, but his view of the crown‘s use of the military
as an instrument of colonial policy is not entirely
convincing.
委婉地說 not entirely convincing
但是之後語氣相當堅定
too small to be a major instrument
Not until
While it may be true that 讓步,
it is hard to imagine how
這個作者不能完全同意新研究的說法
所以答對這題並不是要看內容 也不用把文章讀完
結構好的文章
自然在用字遣詞中 表露作者的態度與語氣
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 156.111.131.207
推
08/16 11:29, , 1F
08/16 11:29, 1F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
GRE 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章