Re: [請益] 想請問recursive的用意

看板Linguistics (語言學習)作者 (mash)時間17年前 (2008/01/27 21:21), 編輯推噓3(308)
留言11則, 5人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
※ 引述《singjack (偽善者)》之銘言: : 有個題目他問 : which of the follwing rule is recursive : a. Y→bX : b. X→Yac : c. X→Ycz : d. Y→bcY : 查了字典 : 他只說是遞歸的 : 不知道要怎麼運用recursive這項規則 : 麻煩知道的告訴我一下 : 有例子更好 謝謝 : 再問一個問題 : We can use [__NP] to represent the subcategorization of verbs like ____. : a.put b.give c.need d.disappear recursive: try to write down tree diagram. In option d, Y regard as Yp; bcY regard YP's head, head Y project to YP. so that, there will be limited recursive process. answer b: the subcatgorization of verb put: put, verb[___NP PP] Forexample: Mary put the book on the table verb "put"takes NP: the book and PP: on the table that is, take two arguments as its complement from above my opinion, the correct answer is c.need hope you understand^^" -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 59.105.18.212

01/27 22:04, , 1F
簡單的說, 你只要看到一條rule, 箭頭左邊的符號, 又出現在
01/27 22:04, 1F

01/27 22:04, , 2F
箭頭右邊, 那就一定是recursive了. 這不限在同一條rule裏,
01/27 22:04, 2F

01/27 22:05, , 3F
一組rules, 只要箭頭左邊的符號也出現在箭頭右邊, 也是.
01/27 22:05, 3F

01/27 22:31, , 4F
第三題為什麼不是c)need 如果是b)give 不是應該要
01/27 22:31, 4F

01/27 22:32, , 5F
give, verb[__NP NP] ? IO/DO對嗎?
01/27 22:32, 5F

01/27 23:51, , 6F
應該是need吧@@
01/27 23:51, 6F

01/28 06:57, , 7F
m大是說c沒錯ㄚ 他說的answer b是指第二題^^
01/28 06:57, 7F

01/28 23:49, , 8F
Give,[_NP NP]是Transformation後的Subcategorization
01/28 23:49, 8F

01/28 23:52, , 9F
深層結構是[_ NP PP] eg: I give book to Mary
01/28 23:52, 9F

01/28 23:54, , 10F
DS和SS的分法,是依照Thematic Hierachy去定的
01/28 23:54, 10F

01/30 20:17, , 11F
嗯,謝謝樓上的解說!所以..答案是 b)give?的意思嘛
01/30 20:17, 11F
文章代碼(AID): #17d8LVxH (Linguistics)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #17d8LVxH (Linguistics)