[請益] referentiality -- 91年師大語概(英語教學組)

看板Linguistics (語言學習)作者 (用功讀書)時間15年前 (2010/01/17 11:15), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/1
不好意思, 請問一下各位高手, 在葛瑞老師的書中說以下七個畫底線的詞語中, race riots 和 a bill 展現的是 "unreferentiality", 其他的都是"referentiality"。 請問高手們為什麼是這樣呢? 我查了書和網站,還是悟不出背後的道理。 有請高手開示了,感謝~ <<Identify each of the underlined NPs in terms of its (A) definiteness, (B) referentiality, and (C) thematic role.>> We have known race riots, draft riots, labor violence, secession, ========== anti-war protests, and a whiskey rebellion, but one kind of trouble we've never had: a language riot. On August I of last year the U.S. House or Representatives approved ================================= a bill that would make English the official languageof the United States. The ====== vote was 259 to 169, with 223 Republicans and thirty-six Democrats voting in favor and eight Republicans, 160 Democrats, and one Independent voting =============== against. The debate was intense, acrid and partisan. On March 25 of last year the Supreme Court agreed to review a case involving an Arizona law that would require public employees to conduct government business only in English. ================ Arizona is one of several states that have passed "Official English" or ============== "English Only" laws. The appeal to the Supreme Court followed a 6-to-5 ================= ruling, in October of 1995, by a federal appeals court striking down the Arizona law. These events suggest how divisive a public issue language could become in America-even it has until now scarecely been taken seriously. (Adapted from Atlantic Monthly, "Should English Be the Law?", April 1997) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.24.187.187
文章代碼(AID): #1BKe3dg0 (Linguistics)
文章代碼(AID): #1BKe3dg0 (Linguistics)