Re: Ask Jon Frank at PTT

看板MBA (企業管理碩士)作者 (Precision Essay)時間14年前 (2011/07/03 11:27), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串3/5 (看更多)
ROUND ONE VERSUS ROUND TWO STRATEGY Okay gang. Today, I want to shake things up a bit. Keep things interesting, if we can. Let's talk about savvy Round 1 strategy. As we all know, there is a slight advantage associated with applying during Round 1. in light of this, many applicants fall into a somewhat common trap: they apply to all their favorite schools first. They batch all their top programs in Round One. After all, we are more likely to get in! : ) This is a bad idea, gang. Why? Well...let's get into it. First of all, your first submitted app will NOT be your best. I dont care how hard you try, or how much you trust your consultant. You will get better as you go, I assure you. Secondly, it is just such a risky proposition. Instead, we would prefer that you take advantage of Round 1 by applying to some SAFER schools during Round 1 as well. That way, you are that much more likely to get in! We like options, and we like actions that mitigate our risk. That is why we recommend that applicants apply to a good mix of programs during Round 1--both stretch programs, and safer ones. Be smart gang, and mitigate your risk. Hope this makes sense, my friends. And keep in touch. Jon Frank Co-Founder, Precision -- HBS 2005 http://www.precisionessay.com / -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 221.182.46.5 ※ 編輯: jonfrank 來自: 118.112.23.43 (08/04 18:15)
文章代碼(AID): #1E3-6nlf (MBA)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1E3-6nlf (MBA)