[請益] 這樣有侵犯專利嗎?

看板Patent (專利)作者 (英倫情人)時間18年前 (2006/08/04 23:42), 編輯推噓3(304)
留言7則, 3人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
請叫各位前輩: 如果有一篇美國專利是這樣 他的權利項只有宣稱 light emitting diode 但是他在說明中指出這個LED 可以是infrared 那如果我們也使用紅外光的 光源 是不是靜觸碰它的專利 如果是要如何避免? 如下文所示: What is claimed is: 1. A modulated optical mouse for a personal computer, the optical mouse comprising: a body having a predetermined space defined inside the body and having at least one lead securely provided inside the space and feet each electrically connected to one of the feet; at least one light emitting diode mounted inside the space to ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ electrically connect with the lead, the light emitting diode being at a bottom of the body; and at least one sensor received in the space to electrically connect with the lead and to correspond to the reflective light from reflective surface (table surface) of light emitting diode. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT [0024] The LED 3 is mounted inside the space 21 to electrically connect with the lead 22. The LED 3 is at the bottom of the body 2 and is able to emit visible light, infrared and the like. ^^^^^^^^^ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.5.72

08/04 23:59, , 1F
純在光源這部份 說明書既已寫到包括發出紅外線 應該就
08/04 23:59, 1F

08/05 00:04, , 2F
有包到了 可是 用LED以外的紅外線發射裝置 應該是不
08/05 00:04, 2F

08/05 00:06, , 3F
算侵 claim要每一字句都比對
08/05 00:06, 3F

08/05 01:33, , 4F
重點在你有沒有用LED...跟有沒有紅外線沒關係
08/05 01:33, 4F

08/05 21:46, , 5F
推樓上~重點在LED
08/05 21:46, 5F

08/06 20:54, , 6F
不知道LED是不是一開始就這樣寫的,基本上應該是要寫發光
08/06 20:54, 6F

08/06 20:55, , 7F
源或是發光裝置,等oa下來不行再限說會比較好
08/06 20:55, 7F
文章代碼(AID): #14qshBmh (Patent)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #14qshBmh (Patent)