Re: [請益] 這樣有侵犯專利嗎?

看板Patent (專利)作者 (英倫情人)時間18年前 (2006/08/06 12:10), 編輯推噓1(105)
留言6則, 2人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
如果是 infrard 的 LED 有觸碰到的話 那 VCSEL 的 chip 也算是其中一種嗎? ※ 引述《chishow (英倫情人)》之銘言: : 請叫各位前輩: : 如果有一篇美國專利是這樣 他的權利項只有宣稱 light emitting diode : 但是他在說明中指出這個LED 可以是infrared 那如果我們也使用紅外光的 : 光源 是不是靜觸碰它的專利 如果是要如何避免? 如下文所示: : What is claimed is: : 1. A modulated optical mouse for a personal computer, the optical : mouse comprising: : a body having a predetermined space defined inside the body and : having at least one lead securely provided inside the space and : feet each electrically connected to one of the feet; : at least one light emitting diode mounted inside the space to : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ : electrically connect with the lead, the light emitting diode being : at a bottom of the body; and : at least one sensor received in the space to electrically connect : with the lead and to correspond to the reflective light from : reflective surface (table surface) of light emitting diode. : DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT : [0024] The LED 3 is mounted inside the space 21 to electrically : connect with the lead 22. The LED 3 is at the bottom of the body 2 : and is able to emit visible light, infrared and the like. : ^^^^^^^^^ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.5.72

08/06 20:56, , 1F
這樣的問題沒人敢打包票,要看VCSEL是不是被涵蓋在LED內
08/06 20:56, 1F

08/06 20:58, , 2F
以剛剛查了一下,兩者都屬面射型雷射發光,不知道會不會因
08/06 20:58, 2F

08/06 20:58, , 3F
為這樣被歸類在一起,而被認為侵權?不敢保證
08/06 20:58, 3F

08/09 00:00, , 4F
美國公開20030142075號公開案?
08/09 00:00, 4F

08/09 00:00, , 5F
這個案子應該已經死了
08/09 00:00, 5F

08/09 00:01, , 6F
不過對應台灣案倒是有通過,公告第549490新型專利
08/09 00:01, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #14rMkaBu (Patent)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #14rMkaBu (Patent)