[問題] 請教迴避設計與防範

看板Patent (專利)作者 (b.s.1.0)時間12年前 (2014/02/16 12:45), 編輯推噓3(3011)
留言14則, 6人參與, 最新討論串1/3 (看更多)
假設有一個發明是LED array電源控制方法與系統 LED array開始使用過後,光度會衰退。 因此本發明是: 全新的LED,供給電壓 V1。 LED使用一段時間後 (累積 on/off 次數達 N1 後),供給電壓改為 V2,V2 > V1。 初步擬的 claim 如下 1: 1. A power supplying method implemented by an LED array 2: comprising an LED, a voltage supplying unit coupled to the 3: LED, and a counter coupled to the voltage supplying unit, 4: the method comprising: 5: determing that the counter is greater than N1; 6: supplying, by the voltage supplying unit, a voltage V1 to 7: the LED when the counter is not greater than N1; 8: supplying, by the voltage supplying unit, a voltage V2 to 9: the LED when the counter is greater than N1, wherein V2 > V1; and 10: incremeting, by the voltage supplying unit, the counter 11: at the time when the voltage supplying unit supplies a voltage 12: >= V1 to the LED; 想要向各位請教的是 (1) claim 有什麼寫得不好的地方。 (2) 是否有方法,可獲取大部分的功效,又不會落入 claim。 (我覺得很容易想出來) (3) 假設回到申請階段,如何修改 claim 防堵 (2) 所想出來的方法? 這就像是是矛與盾的問題,先設計出矛,又修改盾來防範。 我個人覺得在專利的世界,盾會贏得勝利吧。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.73.49.34 ※ 編輯: bs10 來自: 203.73.49.34 (02/16 12:58)

02/16 13:12, , 1F
a LED
02/16 13:12, 1F

02/16 13:44, , 2F
claim 1的技術特徵不明確,第二點你覺得很容易就自己想囉
02/16 13:44, 2F

02/16 13:45, , 3F
對我來說,專利都是矛,只是利不利
02/16 13:45, 3F

02/16 17:21, , 4F
(2) 請愛用TRIMMING或TRIZ
02/16 17:21, 4F

02/16 17:21, , 5F
(3)申請的時候就運用各種創新方法做好布局啦
02/16 17:21, 5F

02/17 09:13, , 6F
decrement when V < V1?
02/17 09:13, 6F

02/17 10:44, , 7F
counter ? counter value?
02/17 10:44, 7F

02/17 11:00, , 8F
若真的要包那麼大 不如用 increasing the voltage
02/17 11:00, 8F

02/17 11:00, , 9F
suplied to the LEDs 比較乾脆...
02/17 11:00, 9F

02/17 11:01, , 10F
supplied
02/17 11:01, 10F

02/17 11:03, , 11F
題外話 LEDs光衰大多因為散熱沒做好 晶片太熱效率降低
02/17 11:03, 11F

02/17 11:04, , 12F
利用增加電壓來補光衰與引鴆止渴無異?
02/17 11:04, 12F

02/20 14:22, , 13F
練習迴避設計,建議拿真實案例。專利說明書隨手可得。
02/20 14:22, 13F

02/20 14:23, , 14F
我當初除了練習自己的領域,也練習其他領域的專利。
02/20 14:23, 14F
文章代碼(AID): #1J049XMG (Patent)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1J049XMG (Patent)