Re: [問題] 各位前輩學長,請問你們一天時間的規劃갠…

看板PhD (博士班)作者lerudit (l'Erudit)時間20年前 (2006/04/22 01:20)推噓2(2推 0噓 1→)

留言3則, 3人參與討論串3/5 (看更多)

※ 引述《ReLocal (奇蹟小子)》之銘言： : 標題: Re: [問題] 各位前輩學長,請問你們一天時間的規劃갠… : 時間: Fri Apr 21 14:48:10 2006 : : -- : ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) : ◆ From: 140.116.35.144 : 推 warners:對..至少也可以知道國外的步調..不錯的就學起來..哈~ 04/21 17:02 : 推 kalamucho:推一下~ 我最希望看到的也是交流以找出 "台灣學界要如何 04/21 17:18 : → kalamucho:(eventually)追上國際一流" 的具體改進方針/資訊/知識:) 04/21 17:29 : 推 kalamucho:↑ 我認為亞洲來說，日本和以色列都可算 well-balanced; 04/21 17:38 : → kalamucho:國內能產出優秀的研究者，又持續有效地向西方產學界取經 04/21 17:46 : → kalamucho:[補]上述"國際一流"是指 US top 10-20; top ~5 不可能啦 04/21 19:07 I think, there have already been too many discussions relating to reputation lists in Taiwan. I think ReLocal is right. As long as you have not stopped thinking the reputation and put attention on 'how we can do it better', you won't be able to get on the right position and do somethhing really helpful. So, I would suggest to forget whatever top whatever, possible or impossible missions. It doesn't matter that Taiwan would be better than the US 9 o'clock next Monday or next decade. The most important is, whether Taiwan will be better next Monday than yesterday. It would be helpful if talking about something very practical; might be not big deal, but does help. I dared to share how some foreign schools to deal with safety issue and working hour in an article recently. Why don't you start a topic for something you think is helpful and very real. We will be happy to share your points. However, always arguing about 'first class' and 'top whatever' just makes here more and more boring. Anyway... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 81.111.56.53