Re: [問題] 理工科博士班的月薪
: → GSJ:痾 有點懷疑你常看JACS的文章嗎 說到comm文章的數量 06/10 21:30
: → GSJ:還沒幾個期刊能比它多吧 當然chem. comm.例外啊 06/10 21:32
: 推 bumin:angew比jacs屌ㄟ 哪是隨便發的 06/10 21:49
: 推 lunarblue:亂扯一通...台灣最好是發JACS很難啦... 06/11 00:08
: → lunarblue:還有angew比JACS好且難發...這是基本常識... 06/11 00:0
基本常識? you must be kidding!
The reason why Angew. Chem. has a higher impact factor is because
it only has reviews and communications which always receive more
citations. If you are really in the chemistry business, you should
know publishing a JACS comm is tougher than an Angew. Chem. one.
At least from all the people I know, we submit to AC after the paper is
rejected by JACS.
Have you submitted any papers by yourself before? Wait to make that
comment after you have done it.
They are both good journals. But saying angew chem 比JACS好且難發是基本常識
or angew chem 比jacs屌 is wrong. Plus people do use Angew Chem instead of
just angew.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 192.33.128.3
推
06/11 09:35, , 1F
06/11 09:35, 1F
推
06/11 12:12, , 2F
06/11 12:12, 2F
→
06/11 12:12, , 3F
06/11 12:12, 3F
→
06/11 12:14, , 4F
06/11 12:14, 4F
→
06/11 12:16, , 5F
06/11 12:16, 5F
→
06/11 12:17, , 6F
06/11 12:17, 6F
→
06/11 12:19, , 7F
06/11 12:19, 7F
→
06/11 12:21, , 8F
06/11 12:21, 8F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 11 之 14 篇)：
PhD 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
114
209