[期刊] 投稿經驗分享
1. 領域:Microscopy
2. 期刊刊名 : Ultramicroscopy
3. 被accepted/revised/rejected : Revise
4. 投稿後大約多久才收到結果 : 4 month
5. reviewer的數目(comment數目) : 4+1(編輯) (34 comments)
這篇我去年10月投稿12月狀態變成requested review completed
然後狀態在1月初又更新一次 依然為requested review completed
今天收到信,終於知道發生了什麼事:
原來reviewer意見分歧,所以又review一次,
編輯說,結果還是很分歧,他自己又重看一次,決定給我revise的機會
最誇張的是某兩個reviewer對於我投的這篇簡直兩極化
其中一人:
In summary, the present manuscript is not suitable for publication and should
be rejected.
另外一位:
In my opinion the results presented by the authors clearly confirm their
statements. I think the quality of the manuscript is very sound and the
results presented are suitable for publication.
還有另一人說英文不錯、一人說英文要加強XDDD
不知道revise後還是這四人看嗎?
--
◤ ◥ ◢ ◣
傑米,炸掉它吧。 ⊙▁⊙─ ─⊙▂⊙ 碰到問題,用C4就對了!
╰ ∕皿﹨ ◥皿◤ ╯
◥█◤◢ ◥ ︶◤
Adam Savage ◤ ︶ ◥◤ ﹨▼∕◥ James Hyneman
MYTHBUSTERS ◥ ◤\◥ by dajidali
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.116.141.22
推
01/23 02:33, , 1F
01/23 02:33, 1F
→
01/23 02:33, , 2F
01/23 02:33, 2F
※ 編輯: delphi3 來自: 140.116.141.22 (01/23 02:34)
推
01/23 03:35, , 3F
01/23 03:35, 3F
推
01/23 21:16, , 4F
01/23 21:16, 4F
→
01/23 21:16, , 5F
01/23 21:16, 5F
→
01/24 00:10, , 6F
01/24 00:10, 6F
討論串 (同標題文章)
PhD 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
15
44