法領域的投稿規則--多重投稿
理工科研究論文投稿的習慣(幾乎)都是獨家投稿，然而這種投稿習慣
並非是用所有領域，比方說，美國法學領域就不是這樣。
就以下文章可見，作者和期刊協商是否獨家投稿本刊，以及倘獨家投稿
本刊，本刊承諾在哪個期限之前予以審稿決定等。看起來，法國法學領域
的作者與期刊之間的關係更「對等」︰你挑我，我挑你；你要我獨家投稿
，我要你限期決定等等。
以下摘錄一段描述美國法學期刊獨家投稿規定之網文的片段供參。
Everything you need to know about exclusive law review submissions
https://blog.scholasticahq.com/post/lr-exclusive-submission-track/
More law reviews than ever have begun introducing “exclusive submission track
” options for authors, but the concept is still relatively new to legal
scholarship. Are you wondering what “exclusive submissions” means exactly
and how the article selection process differs for exclusive papers?
...
What are exclusive submission tracks?: Here’s the lowdown
At the highest level, exclusive submission tracks are for authors who want to
pre-commit their article to a particular law review if accepted for
publication there. To do this, the author must commit to submitting
exclusively to that one law review for a designated timeframe (usually 1-3
weeks).
In general, exclusive submission tracks are a way to help articles editors
have time to read through submissions before pressures of offer deadlines
from other journals start coming in. This can help reduce the number of
expedite requests that law reviews receive and curb instances of exploding
offers. In theory, the more authors opt to submit their papers to particular
law reviews exclusively, the fewer simultaneous submissions those law reviews
(and other law reviews) will have to juggle.
In exchange for authors agreeing to submit to them exclusively, some law
reviews will promise priority review for exclusive submissions or even
guarantee decisions on those articles by a given date. When law reviews can
ensure decisions within a set timeframe, exclusive tracks also offer authors
the benefit of knowing they will get a reply from their top-choice journal
before the article selection cycle is over. That way, the author can either
publish with that law review or have time to submit to other options if their
article is not accepted.
As indicated above, there are different “flavors” of exclusive submission
tracks, both in terms of the length of time law reviews require for
submission review and what, if any, promises they make, such as priority
board review or faster decisions. Additionally, while some law reviews allow
exclusive submissions throughout the year, others limit them to generally
slower submission periods outside of the peak spring (February through April)
and fall (August through October) article selection cycles. And some journals
take a hybrid approach allowing exclusive submissions throughout the year but
only ensuring decisions for exclusive articles during specific times. For
example, Columbia Law Review has a “standard exclusive submission” track
and an “early exclusive submission” track offered in the summer months
where early submissions are guaranteed a response by August 1st.
In most cases, law reviews will allow authors to submit articles that they
have previously sent to other journals for exclusive consideration without
requiring them to withdraw those other submissions. The only caveat is that
the author must agree not to submit to any other journals during their
exclusive submission and to honor their promise to accept an offer if
extended.
...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.24.89.61 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PhD/M.1622638403.A.D99.html
PhD 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
18
44
