[Work] GRE issue
When research priorities are being set for science, education, or any other
area, the most important question to consider is: How many people's lives
will be improved if the results are successful.
The speaker asserts that the when we determine the priority of
researches in the scientific, educational, or any other area, how many
people's lives will be improved due to the success of the result is the most
important question to consider. I find this statement problematic. Although
researches are done to benefit human beings, there are other considerations
worthy of equally importance, such as the bad effect of the research.
Besides, there may be other effects that the researcher did not think of when
the research was done.
Admittedly, the goal of any research is to bring benefits to people. The
society develops because of all forms of researches that create something
valuable or solve some tough problems. In the field of science, for example,
the invention of electricity has driven the world forward. Researches in the
medical field have made us more healthy. Similarly, studies of educational
issues seldom come to an end, because education is both an art and a science.
To explain how children learn, many theories were therefore proposed, such as
behaviorism and humanism. As these issues continue, many teachers have find
some solutions to their problems and then make their instruction effective.
However, how many benefits the research brings to people is at most one
of the reasons when we think of the priority of researches. Researches do not
always lead to positive results. History has shown that some researches and
experiment resulted in great suffering to human beings. An instance in
science is the researches of nuclear weapons. While they are not allowed to
use in wars, many countries still spend a great amount of fees and efforts to
develop better ones. In this respective, we should consider the possible
danger of the result prior to its advantage. Likewise, researches in the
wrong direction may lead to the harm of education. A great number of students
are used to testify some hypothesis before we have further understanding of
the research. As a result, many of the students suffered from the failure of
the research. The result is so influential that these students may have
problems learning all their lives.
Additionally, if we had to know the improvements the research might
bring about before doing it, many great achievement would not be reached.
Many researchers do the research not because it will have good influences,
but out of creativity, interest or curiosity. Think of Edison. He is so
passionate about his experiment that he could not think of the possible
change that it will lead to. Not knowing that the use of telephone will be so
common now, Edison still contributed to the world with his researches and
inventions. It can be seen as a counterexample to the speaker's assertion.
On balance, the question suggested by the speaker is partially right. While
we think of the possible benefit a research could bring to people as a
criterion to decide whether it is valuable, we should consider its negative
effects as well. Furthermore, a research may have an influential effect which
is beyond the understanding of the people at that time.
發現自己的同義字能力嚴重不足，寫來寫去還是這幾個字。
四十五分鐘也超級不夠用...
看來還需要很多練習啊...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.166.251.111
ST-English 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
