[請益] TPO18 閱讀-第一篇和第二篇疑問

看板TOEFL_iBT (TOEFL_iBT托福)作者 (小剛炮)時間14年前 (2011/08/19 14:59), 編輯推噓3(3013)
留言16則, 1人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
The political institutions of the four countries posed no significant barriers to industrialization or economic growth. The nineteenth century passed relatively peacefully for these countries, with progressive democratization taking place in all of them. They were reasonably well governed, without notable corruption or grandiose state projects, although in all of them the government gave some aid to railways, and in Sweden the state built the main lines. As small countries dependent on foreign markets, they followed a liberal trade policy in the main, though 【a protectionist movement developed in Sweden】. In Denmark and Sweden agricultural reforms took place gradually from the late eighteenth century through the first half of the nineteenth, resulting in a new class of peasant landowners with a definite market orientation. 9.The author includes the information that【a protectionist movement developed in Sweden】in order to A.support the claim that the political institution of the four countries posed on significant barriers to industrialization or economic growth B.identify an exception to the general trend favoring liberal trade policy 正解:B 我想知道選B的線索為何? 是因為只有瑞典發展了貿易保護運動,而其他國家沒有嗎? 第二篇:The mystery of yawning Another flaw of the tiredness theory is that yawning does not raise alertness or physiological activity, as the theory would predict. When researchers measured the heart rate, muscle tension and skin conductance of people before, during and after yawning, they did detect some changes in skin conductance following yawning, indicating a slight increase in physiological activity. However, similar changes occurred when the subjects were asked simply to open their mouths or to breathe deeply. Yawning did nothing special to their state of physiological activity. Experiments have also cast serious doubt on the belief that yawning is triggered by a drop in blood oxygen or a rise in blood carbon dioxide. ■ Volunteers were told to think about yawning while they breathed either normal air, pure oxygen, or an air mixture with an above-normal level of carbon dioxide.■ If the theory was correct, breathing air with extra carbon dioxide should have triggered yawning, while breathing pure oxygen should have suppressed yawning.■ In fact, neither condition made any difference to the frequency of yawning, which remained constant at about 24 yawns per hour. ■ Another experiment demonstrated that physical exercise, which was sufficiently vigorous to double the rate of breathing, had no effect on the frequency of yawning Again the implication is that yawning has little or nothing to do with oxygen. 13.下句適合填入哪一個方塊? This, however, was not a case. 正解:C 為什麼不能填在A? 填在C那個this指的是什麼? 有人能為小弟解惑嗎?? 感激不盡 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.136.211.19 ※ 編輯: picacoman 來自: 140.136.211.19 (08/19 16:08) ※ 編輯: picacoman 來自: 140.136.211.19 (08/19 16:10)

08/20 04:40, , 1F
提供在下的另一種解讀文章脈絡的見解供參考
08/20 04:40, 1F

08/20 04:42, , 2F
在這段說明政治與經濟之間互相影響的文章裡,在段落中間
08/20 04:42, 2F

08/20 04:46, , 3F
說了"though",在語言的邏輯中表示將要提到的是'相反'或
08/20 04:46, 3F

08/20 04:48, , 4F
'與前述不同'的觀念。 如果能這樣來理解文章,答案選項A
08/20 04:48, 4F

08/20 04:50, , 5F
support就不符合邏輯;選項B中exception就很適合用來解釋
08/20 04:50, 5F

08/20 04:51, , 6F
這個tough副詞子句在段論中的作用
08/20 04:51, 6F

08/20 04:55, , 7F
RE:yawning
08/20 04:55, 7F

08/20 04:59, , 8F
"this" infer "breathing air with extra carbon dioxide
08/20 04:59, 8F

08/20 05:01, , 9F
should have triggered yawning"
08/20 05:01, 9F

08/20 05:11, , 10F
空格A前一句是在提出論點,緊接著是將如何證明及支持該
08/20 05:11, 10F

08/20 05:18, , 11F
論點。假若however插入A,表示馬上就加以反駁,但是下句
08/20 05:18, 11F

08/20 05:19, , 12F
Volunteers該句還只是方法敘述而不是相反論點,因此不適
08/20 05:19, 12F

08/20 05:21, , 13F
合構成邏輯上的反義。
08/20 05:21, 13F

08/20 05:23, , 14F
另外空格C前有個很值得注意的文法關鍵。
08/20 05:23, 14F

08/20 05:25, , 15F
should've triggered&suppressed, 這表示了trigger跟
08/20 05:25, 15F

08/20 05:28, , 16F
suppress都被預期出現但卻沒有出現,所以接下來說however
08/20 05:28, 16F
文章代碼(AID): #1EJWdHWX (TOEFL_iBT)
文章代碼(AID): #1EJWdHWX (TOEFL_iBT)