[請益] TPO22 the birth of photography

看板TOEFL_iBT (TOEFL_iBT托福)作者tom192180 (tom510558)時間14年前 (2011/09/11 10:51)推噓0(0推 0噓 14→)

留言14則, 5人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)

Paragraph 3: A second and very different process was patented by the British inventor William Henry Talbot (1800-1877) in 1841. Talbot’s “calotype” was the first negative-to-positive process and the direct ancestor of the modern photograph. The calotype was revolutionary in its use of chemically treated paper in which areas hit by light became dark in tone, producing a negative image. This “negative” as Talbot called it, could then be used to print multiple positive images on another piece of treated paper. Paragraph 4: The two processes produced very different results. The daguerreotype was a unique image that reproduced what was in front of the camera lens in minute, unselective detail and could not be duplicated. The calotype could be made in series, and was thus the equivalent of an etching or an engraving. Its general effect was soft edged and tonal. 4. According to paragraph 2 and 3, which of the following did the daguerreotype and the calotype have in common? ○They were equally useful for artists. ○They could be reproduced. ○They produced a permanent image. ○They were produced on treated paper. 答案是三，為什麼二錯= = 不是都可以重複生產嗎? Paragraph 6: Photography did indeed make certain kinds of painting obsolete— the daguerreotype virtually did away with the portrait miniature. It also made the whole business of making and owning images democratic. Portraiture, once a luxury for the privileged few, was suddenly well within the reach of many more people. 黃色那句我看不太懂QQ 可請大家解釋嗎THX!! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 122.126.30.241 ※ 編輯: tom192180 來自: 122.126.30.241 (09/11 11:19)

→

chantel

09/11 12:23, , 1^F

09/11 12:23, 1^F

其實我還是不懂QQ 話說他不是說reproduce嗎...? The daguerreotype was a unique image that reproduced what was in front of the camera lens in minute, unselective detail and could not be duplicated. 這句話也不懂，感覺文法好怪喔＝　＝　他是在修是主詞嗎@@? 可是前面沒有連接詞耶...? ※ 編輯: tom192180 來自: 122.126.30.241 (09/11 14:26)