[請益] 物理博士有什麼建議的職缺?
如題
小弟有幸拿到中央大學的物理博士學位
想問一下 如果在業界
什麼樣的職缺 可以比較有發揮 和學以致用的
小弟大致想了幾個
不外乎 工研院 財團法人的研究單位 台積電等等
我做的領域是奈米材料方面的理論計算和模擬 ( 分子動力學 最佳化演算法 磁性性質)
主要是自己寫code 跑運算 也懂第一原理和相關軟體操作
台灣目前那些公司有需要像我這樣的人力呢?
感謝各位~~~~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.230.30.252
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tech_Job/M.1450018805.A.4B4.html
推
12/13 23:02, , 1F
12/13 23:02, 1F
→
12/13 23:02, , 2F
12/13 23:02, 2F
推
12/13 23:05, , 3F
12/13 23:05, 3F
推
12/13 23:07, , 4F
12/13 23:07, 4F
噓
12/13 23:12, , 5F
12/13 23:12, 5F
→
12/13 23:14, , 6F
12/13 23:14, 6F
推
12/13 23:20, , 7F
12/13 23:20, 7F
→
12/13 23:47, , 8F
12/13 23:47, 8F
推
12/13 23:57, , 9F
12/13 23:57, 9F
→
12/13 23:57, , 10F
12/13 23:57, 10F
噓
12/14 00:05, , 11F
12/14 00:05, 11F
畢業了啊
噓
12/14 00:09, , 12F
12/14 00:09, 12F
噓
12/14 00:36, , 13F
12/14 00:36, 13F
有想過待學術界 但似乎正式職缺更少
推
12/14 00:45, , 14F
12/14 00:45, 14F
推
12/14 01:01, , 15F
12/14 01:01, 15F
推
12/14 01:04, , 16F
12/14 01:04, 16F
推
12/14 01:06, , 17F
12/14 01:06, 17F
※ 編輯: lovepork (61.230.30.252), 12/14/2015 01:18:55
推
12/14 04:22, , 18F
12/14 04:22, 18F
→
12/14 04:23, , 19F
12/14 04:23, 19F
推
12/14 07:19, , 20F
12/14 07:19, 20F
推
12/14 08:27, , 21F
12/14 08:27, 21F
→
12/14 08:27, , 22F
12/14 08:27, 22F
噓
12/14 09:17, , 23F
12/14 09:17, 23F
推
12/14 09:39, , 24F
12/14 09:39, 24F
→
12/14 09:39, , 25F
12/14 09:39, 25F
→
12/14 09:39, , 26F
12/14 09:39, 26F
→
12/14 09:45, , 27F
12/14 09:45, 27F
→
12/14 09:45, , 28F
12/14 09:45, 28F
推
12/14 09:53, , 29F
12/14 09:53, 29F
感謝各位~~ 討論討論收穫也很多
※ 編輯: lovepork (140.115.30.19), 12/14/2015 10:19:17
噓
12/14 10:39, , 30F
12/14 10:39, 30F
推
12/14 10:54, , 31F
12/14 10:54, 31F
噓
12/14 11:02, , 32F
12/14 11:02, 32F
推
12/14 12:29, , 33F
12/14 12:29, 33F
推
12/14 16:47, , 34F
12/14 16:47, 34F
XDD
※ 編輯: lovepork (61.230.30.252), 12/14/2015 18:05:25
推
12/14 19:22, , 35F
12/14 19:22, 35F
→
12/14 19:36, , 36F
12/14 19:36, 36F
→
12/14 19:59, , 37F
12/14 19:59, 37F
→
12/14 20:06, , 38F
12/14 20:06, 38F
噓
12/14 21:53, , 39F
12/14 21:53, 39F
推
12/14 22:37, , 40F
12/14 22:37, 40F
推
12/14 23:25, , 41F
12/14 23:25, 41F
推
12/15 07:55, , 42F
12/15 07:55, 42F
是不是因為第一原理大部分都是跑套裝軟體而不是寫code的緣故呢?
我覺得第一原理能夠自己寫subroutine其實算很強了耶
※ 編輯: lovepork (140.115.30.19), 12/15/2015 09:45:19
推
12/15 15:47, , 43F
12/15 15:47, 43F
→
12/15 21:31, , 44F
12/15 21:31, 44F
→
12/15 21:32, , 45F
12/15 21:32, 45F
→
12/15 21:35, , 46F
12/15 21:35, 46F
→
12/15 21:35, , 47F
12/15 21:35, 47F
推
12/15 21:39, , 48F
12/15 21:39, 48F
→
12/15 21:39, , 49F
12/15 21:39, 49F
XDDDDDDDDDDD
→
12/15 23:51, , 50F
12/15 23:51, 50F
→
12/15 23:51, , 51F
12/15 23:51, 51F
※ 編輯: lovepork (140.115.30.19), 12/16/2015 11:58:31
推
12/16 21:36, , 52F
12/16 21:36, 52F
→
12/16 21:37, , 53F
12/16 21:37, 53F
→
12/17 05:57, , 54F
12/17 05:57, 54F
→
12/17 05:58, , 55F
12/17 05:58, 55F
Tech_Job 近期熱門文章
10
18
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
771
1488