Re: [問題] 請問該如何回這位教授的信?

看板studyabroad (留學)作者Quinct ( 丁丁說幹)時間14年前 (2011/10/30 14:26)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)

借題詢問一下，如果他回信寫到： Fine. Our procedure for application to our PhD program is explained in the Department website. The first step is to apply. If you are accepted and matriculate, you must have formal interviews with at least 5 professors. This process is for your protection. No professor can 'claim' a student and no student is obligated to work with any professor.I am ccing Prof. XXX who is the chair of our graduate admissions committee. 前面我都懂，簡單來說就是請你按步驟來。但最後一句我不是很瞭解， cc的目的是要留案底說這學生不要收還是告知admissions committee 我曾經有和此位教授聯繫過，增加我錄取的機率呢？ ※ 引述《flamingJ (Crazy Driver)》之銘言： : 目前在申請PhD : 之前寫信給UC Santa Barbara一位教授表明我的愛意 : 文末表示I have a complete CV if you wish to read more about me. : I am looking forward to your reply. : 等了一週沒有回應，原本以為無望了， : 沒想到一週後教授回信了， : I'm so pleased to hear of your interest in my research and the *** program : at UCSB. Unfortunately, I am unable to respond personally to each prospective : applicant, but here is some information about my work and the application : process. I do plan to accept students this coming year, and I encourage you : to apply. You should know that I am affiliated with the *** emphasis, : and it would be unusual for me to admit students who apply to the ### or : @@@ emphases. : 好像有點希望? (雖然最後她有點誤解，因為我沒有打算走###或@@@領域) : 很高興教授鼓勵我申請(至少有正面回應)， : 但不曉得該如何解讀教授意思，以及接下來該怎麼回信>"< (好歹得回寄個CV呀) : 各位高手可否給我一點您個人對這封信的見解及回信方向? : ps.因為一些個人因素，專業領域名稱必須先隱藏起來，不好意思:( -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 180.176.112.57