PTT職涯區 / Economics (經濟學)

Re: 今年的諾貝爾經濟學獎得主出爐了

看板Economics (經濟學)作者 (記憶滿足回憶的人)時間18年前 (2007/10/16 02:55), 編輯推噓8(8推 0噓 24→)
留言32則, 9人參與, 最新討論串2/3 (看更多)
※ 引述《HowLeeHi (想和妳去把把風)》之銘言： : 就在剛剛公佈了 : http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/laureates/2007/ : 分別是三位美國人 : Leonid Hurwicz : Eric S. Maskin : Roger B. Myerson 請問版上有對機制設計理論熟悉的先進嗎? 我剛才看了一下,這理論大概是設計在個經內類似賽局的模型 大至上是用來推論拍賣,社福跟醫學院學生的管制入學,公共財與最適稅收 好像是設計出一個模式讓結果可以依照設計模型人希望的結果走 有沒有大大可以詳加解釋一下這個模型的意涵,謝謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.170.174.208
推
10/16 03:41, , 1F
10/16 03:41, 1F
→
10/16 03:43, , 2F
You can download the article
10/16 03:43, 2F
→
10/16 03:44, , 3F
"Scientific Background" from the
10/16 03:44, 3F
→
10/16 03:44, , 4F
press release page of the Nobel
10/16 03:44, 4F
→
10/16 03:44, , 5F
website.
10/16 03:44, 5F
推
10/16 07:55, , 6F
不是醫學院學生的管制入學，
10/16 07:55, 6F
→
10/16 07:55, , 7F
是醫學院畢業生和實習工作之間的matching
10/16 07:55, 7F
推
10/16 20:51, , 8F
基本上..就是加上兩條限制式：IR跟IC..其中
10/16 20:51, 8F
→
10/16 20:51, , 9F
IR=Individual Rationality constraint
10/16 20:51, 9F
→
10/16 20:52, , 10F
IC=Incentive Compatibility Constraint
10/16 20:52, 10F
→
10/16 20:52, , 11F
至於模型的細節請見：Contract Theory, by
10/16 20:52, 11F
→
10/16 20:53, , 12F
Patrick Bolton and Mathias Dewatripont
10/16 20:53, 12F
推
10/16 22:43, , 13F
可以借轉一下嗎 :p
10/16 22:43, 13F
※ kk25:轉錄至看板 NSYSU_ECO96 10/16 22:46
→
10/17 00:42, , 14F
1樓的,不回答就算了,你爸媽忘了教你禮儀嗎?
10/17 00:42, 14F
推
10/17 02:07, , 15F
economist版友沒必要這樣吧，學術討論版上
10/17 02:07, 15F
→
10/17 02:07, , 16F
出現F word 跟人身攻擊不妥吧
10/17 02:07, 16F
推
10/17 02:48, , 17F
If kuromo felt offended, I apologize.
10/17 02:48, 17F
→
10/17 02:49, , 18F
If you keep reading the webpage, it
10/17 02:49, 18F
→
10/17 02:49, , 19F
says, "they gave you a link to this
10/17 02:49, 19F
→
10/17 02:50, , 20F
site as a JOKE." It has been a pretty
10/17 02:50, 20F
→
10/17 02:50, , 21F
popular joke up here. Finally, my
10/17 02:50, 21F
→
10/17 02:51, , 22F
answer was from line 2 to line 4.
10/17 02:51, 22F
→
10/17 02:51, , 23F
That article on the Nobel website is
10/17 02:51, 23F
→
10/17 02:52, , 24F
comprehensive and helpful.
10/17 02:52, 24F
→
10/17 02:53, , 25F
Kumoro's question is impossible to
10/17 02:53, 25F
→
10/17 02:53, , 26F
answer in limited space on bbs, but
10/17 02:53, 26F
→
10/17 02:53, , 27F
that's all answered in the article I
10/17 02:53, 27F
→
10/17 02:54, , 28F
suggested.
10/17 02:54, 28F
推
10/17 22:06, , 29F
解釋這麼多也沒用，剛看到還是不太高興 1F
10/17 22:06, 29F
推
10/18 02:04, , 30F
我倒是覺得沒什麼,或許有的人無法接受
10/18 02:04, 30F
→
10/18 02:09, , 31F
西方幽默吧。更何況economist已道歉。
10/18 02:09, 31F
→
10/18 11:35, , 32F
請到此為止～我想雙方都不是有惡意的謝謝
10/18 11:35, 32F
‣ 更多 kuromo 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #174xUrdq (Economics)
Economics 近期熱門文章
更多 近期熱門文章 >>
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
更多 即時熱門文章 >>
‣ 更多 kuromo 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #174xUrdq (Economics)