[請益] 辭典中的I caught on to what it was...

看板Eng-Class (英文板)作者 (QQ)時間7年前 (2019/01/21 14:23), 7年前編輯推噓1(104)
留言5則, 1人參與, 7年前最新討論串1/1
各位好,請教一下 在辭典看到以下例句: I caught on to what it was the guy was saying. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/catch_on 我的想法: a. I caught on to (something). b. it was what the guy was saying. -->c. I caught on to what it was the guy was saying. a句的something和b句的what有交集,所以兩句合併時,把what移到前面當連接詞, 就成為c. 網友Raymott說 Yes, you can. Also: "I caught on to what it was that the guy was saying". 但我認為照他的說法,就會變成: d. I caught on to what it was that the guy was saying. 推回我的b,就會成為 -->b'. it was what (= thing(s) that) that the guy was saying. (?) 變成有重複的that了。出處:https://goo.gl/qNHwcj 想請教各位意見,謝謝! (PS 我覺得原句的結構就類似這句:I am not what my wife says I am.) ----------------- 解決了: f. It was XXX (that) the guy was saying. (It-cleft sentence) →g. What (= XXX) was it (that) the guy was saying? h. I caught on to the question (= What was it (that) the guy was saying?). g.+h. →i. I caught on to what it was (that) the guy was saying. 後半部是一個名詞子句,但這個名詞子句是由疑問句和分裂句轉化而來。(暈) -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.169.72.41 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Eng-Class/M.1548051839.A.759.html ※ 編輯: scju (1.169.72.41), 01/21/2019 16:15:42

01/21 17:36, 7年前 , 1F
有點太囉嗦了
01/21 17:36, 1F

01/21 17:36, 7年前 , 2F
中文翻譯就是
01/21 17:36, 2F

01/21 17:38, 7年前 , 3F
我終於了解那傢伙所說的是怎麼一回事了
01/21 17:38, 3F

01/21 17:40, 7年前 , 4F
其實就把握一個原則,句子主結構劃分好。其餘都是後
01/21 17:40, 4F

01/21 17:40, 7年前 , 5F
面修飾前面
01/21 17:40, 5F
文章代碼(AID): #1SHML_TP (Eng-Class)
文章代碼(AID): #1SHML_TP (Eng-Class)