Re: [Talk] The Purpose of Morality

看板EngTalk (全英文聊天)作者 (celestial)時間16年前 (2009/10/29 01:36), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串6/14 (看更多)
I learned this from my major a long time ago, but I have an interesting insight here. The vast majority act according to Maslow's hierarchy, yet Human are UNPREDICTIBLE, according to each individual. Their brains are different, consists of various diversity, and revolution comes from the appreciation of this diversity. During cultural revolution, a lot of Chinese lost their belief and morality. They tried to betray each other, and trust was destroyed in the soecity. When people are deprived of their lowest level of needs, they act like animals. However, why, some individuals still insist their belief and moral standards even they encounter a threat to their survival? Are they necessarily stupid? For example, 文天祥, 泰瑞莎, 證嚴上人....too many.. Are these people stupid? I don't think so. I personally respect their choice and admire their courage. ※ 引述《serveto (〈ψ︱A︱ψ〉)》之銘言: : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow%27s_hierarchy_of_needs : According to Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs, human motivation : is decided by a pyramid consisting of five levels: the lowest level : is associated with physiological needs, then safety needs, belonging : needs, esteem needs, self-actualization needs. The higher needs : in this hierarchy only come into focus when the lower needs in the : pyramid are met. Once an individual has moved upwards to the next level : , needs in the lower level will no longer be prioritized. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 76.204.36.189 ※ 編輯: celestial09 來自: 76.204.36.189 (10/29 05:12) ※ 編輯: celestial09 來自: 76.204.36.189 (10/29 05:12)
文章代碼(AID): #1Aw84oT3 (EngTalk)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1Aw84oT3 (EngTalk)