Re: [請益] 請問大家是否擔心自已海外投資的安全?
看板Foreign_Inv (海外投資)作者twryoko (back to September)時間8年前 (2016/10/04 11:46)推噓21(21推 0噓 33→)留言54則, 16人參與討論串2/6 (看更多)
引述綠角的文章
為什麼複委託可以免美國遺產稅?
最可能的原因是,業者直接幫你更改資產持有者姓名,然後沒有跟美國稅務主管單位通報
這是帳戶持有者過世後的繼承轉移。於是,就”免稅”了。
這個做法,假如那一天美國金融主管單位查到的話,金融業者自己被罰錢就算了。最糟的
是,許多以為複委託可以免美國遺產稅的投資人,會赫然發現。複委託的核心就是”複”
這個字。不僅會被課台灣當地的遺產稅,也要課美國的遺產稅。
1.不知道複委託可以免美國遺產稅是否完全是合法?
2.複委託可以視為雙重風險,因為要透過兩個機構去買股票,不過倒閉造成損失的機會,
不知道哪個比較大,前面文章有提到台灣券商是用信託的方式,倒了之後投資人股票還在
,那美國券商投資人的股票也是採信託的方式嗎?
複委託好處是美國那一個有問題的話,台灣這個機構會出面到美國爭取該有的權益,
但是台灣券商有義務負美國券商倒閉全責嗎?賠償所有損失嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.233.142.175
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Foreign_Inv/M.1475552785.A.3B2.html
推
10/04 12:03, , 1F
10/04 12:03, 1F
→
10/04 12:04, , 2F
10/04 12:04, 2F
→
10/04 12:05, , 3F
10/04 12:05, 3F
→
10/04 12:06, , 4F
10/04 12:06, 4F
推
10/04 12:37, , 5F
10/04 12:37, 5F
推
10/04 14:04, , 6F
10/04 14:04, 6F
推
10/04 14:39, , 7F
10/04 14:39, 7F
→
10/04 14:40, , 8F
10/04 14:40, 8F
推
10/04 15:23, , 9F
10/04 15:23, 9F
→
10/04 15:23, , 10F
10/04 15:23, 10F
→
10/04 15:23, , 11F
10/04 15:23, 11F
→
10/04 15:23, , 12F
10/04 15:23, 12F
推
10/04 15:27, , 13F
10/04 15:27, 13F
→
10/04 15:28, , 14F
10/04 15:28, 14F
→
10/04 15:29, , 15F
10/04 15:29, 15F
推
10/04 15:32, , 16F
10/04 15:32, 16F
→
10/04 15:33, , 17F
10/04 15:33, 17F
推
10/04 15:34, , 18F
10/04 15:34, 18F
推
10/04 15:42, , 19F
10/04 15:42, 19F
→
10/04 15:42, , 20F
10/04 15:42, 20F
推
10/04 15:44, , 21F
10/04 15:44, 21F
推
10/04 15:44, , 22F
10/04 15:44, 22F
→
10/04 15:45, , 23F
10/04 15:45, 23F
推
10/04 15:48, , 24F
10/04 15:48, 24F
推
10/04 16:51, , 25F
10/04 16:51, 25F
推
10/04 17:26, , 26F
10/04 17:26, 26F
→
10/04 17:26, , 27F
10/04 17:26, 27F
→
10/04 17:27, , 28F
10/04 17:27, 28F
推
10/04 17:31, , 29F
10/04 17:31, 29F
→
10/04 17:32, , 30F
10/04 17:32, 30F
→
10/04 17:34, , 31F
10/04 17:34, 31F
推
10/04 18:10, , 32F
10/04 18:10, 32F
推
10/04 19:30, , 33F
10/04 19:30, 33F
→
10/04 19:30, , 34F
10/04 19:30, 34F
推
10/04 22:30, , 35F
10/04 22:30, 35F
→
10/04 22:58, , 36F
10/04 22:58, 36F
→
10/04 22:58, , 37F
10/04 22:58, 37F
→
10/04 22:59, , 38F
10/04 22:59, 38F
推
10/04 23:19, , 39F
10/04 23:19, 39F
→
10/04 23:19, , 40F
10/04 23:19, 40F
→
10/04 23:19, , 41F
10/04 23:19, 41F
→
10/04 23:29, , 42F
10/04 23:29, 42F
→
10/04 23:30, , 43F
10/04 23:30, 43F
推
10/04 23:31, , 44F
10/04 23:31, 44F
→
10/04 23:31, , 45F
10/04 23:31, 45F
→
10/04 23:32, , 46F
10/04 23:32, 46F
→
10/04 23:32, , 47F
10/04 23:32, 47F
→
10/04 23:32, , 48F
10/04 23:32, 48F
→
10/04 23:33, , 49F
10/04 23:33, 49F
→
10/04 23:55, , 50F
10/04 23:55, 50F
→
10/04 23:58, , 51F
10/04 23:58, 51F
推
10/05 15:00, , 52F
10/05 15:00, 52F
→
10/05 15:01, , 53F
10/05 15:01, 53F
→
10/05 15:01, , 54F
10/05 15:01, 54F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 6 篇):
Foreign_Inv 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章