Re: [語文] PP1-SC-74.96.138.148

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (gogogo~~~)時間17年前 (2007/11/30 12:30), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串4/4 (看更多)
來自打嘴巴一下~ 才講完我就看到我眼前的文章出現一句: The vesicles targeted by this motif were not lysosomes but instead were early endosomes coincidient with endocytosed CpG DNA. 而且這句中間根本沒有插入句呢! 沒有平衡對象認同的問題。 所以...其實是有這個與法規則存在的嘛? 當N. 作為S.C.時,就有 S. + beV + not + N. (S.C.), but (instead) + beV + N. (S.C.) 這項語法規則存在??? 待討論,我沒找到夠多的例子... ※ 引述《cckjenius (gogogo~~~)》之銘言: : (原文恕刪) : 74. (28503-!-item-!-188;#058&003635) : Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould has argued that many biological traits are : not the products of natural selection,favored : ( due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival,but that they are) : simply random by-products of other evolutionary developments. : (A) due to their enhancement of reproduction or survival, but that they are : (B) due to the reproduction or survival they enhance, but they are : (C) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but : (D) because they enhance reproduction or survival, but are : (E) because of enhancing reproduction or survival, but are : 這題我乍看也會想選 D, 因為 that子句中的 are not..., but are... : 但是再看一遍之後,我比較同意原po的說法, : 1) not..., but... 平衡!! : 所以 not + N, but 後面也要直接加 N. : 2) 而且"逗點" 也是一個線索,如果是because子句中的兩個動詞並列, : 那麼在but前面不能有逗點, 逗點表示把favored之後的插入句隔出來 : 3) 如果說是 reproduction(N1) or survival(N2), but N3 的三名詞並列, : 就更說不通了, 名詞並列不可能有or又有but -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.109.40.42
文章代碼(AID): #17Jv7M_2 (GMAT)
文章代碼(AID): #17Jv7M_2 (GMAT)