[問題] OG11-CR30

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (Nothing is impossible扔)時間16年前 (2008/05/24 01:16), 編輯推噓1(103)
留言4則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money. However, many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments. 30. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's argument? 我想問C (C)Taxes and unemployment insurance are also paid by corporations that are not automating. 這不過就是說 沒有採取自動化的公司也要負擔稅和保險費 那哪裡有反駁勒??? 解答是說 The fact that such costs are paid and will be paid by all corporations, whether or not they automate, weakens the author's argument by suggesting ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ that the increased costs resulting from automation will be spread over a ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ wider group. ^^^^^^^^ 請問後面這句是什麼意思 -- 女:老闆.我要叫一桶瓦斯 我:小姐.幾點了.還在叫瓦斯啊 女:我要洗澡沒瓦斯啊.當然要叫瓦斯啊 我:我要打泡還找不到女人咧 女:我有再做.可以算你便宜一點喔.你要不要.我現在可以去你那邊 我:.......................... 來吧 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.73.254.112

05/24 02:52, , 1F
既然公司不管有沒有自動化,繳的稅跟失業保險都會增加
05/24 02:52, 1F

05/24 02:53, , 2F
那不就意味著自動化並非造成稅金跟失業保險增加的原因嗎?
05/24 02:53, 2F

05/24 03:26, , 3F
那麼有反駁嗎??
05/24 03:26, 3F

05/24 03:56, , 4F
喔 我懂了 感謝
05/24 03:56, 4F
文章代碼(AID): #18Dllfmd (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文
0
1
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
1
4
0
1
文章代碼(AID): #18Dllfmd (GMAT)