[語文] SC代名詞問題 PP2 #36

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (林)時間16年前 (2008/07/14 11:29), 編輯推噓5(5010)
留言15則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
想請問各位 談到代名詞時 老莫曾說優先指代原題主詞 PP詳解總是說指代最近的那個名詞 但有時候原題主詞可能不是最接近代名詞的那個名詞 這就變成要去鑽研句意才能下得了手 但到底是老莫為準 還是PP詳解的說法為準呢 以下有個例題PP2 #36 A group of paleotologists recently announced that a site in Utah has yield fossils of some of the biggest armored dinosaurs ever found, and that they were at least 25 million years older than any similar dinosaur ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ type previously found in North America. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (B)and they are at least 25 million years old than those of any similar dinosaur type that previously was PP詳解說(B)的they指代不明確 但若我把they視為最接近的名詞--dinosaurs 這樣的解釋說不通嗎?? 正解: (D)fossils that are at least 25 million years older than those of any similar dinosaur type previouly 我覺得原題接到(D)這段好突兀喔 而且found不是該用被動語態嗎?? 感謝高手的指點了~~ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.68.14.19

07/14 11:49, , 1F
我記得這題考得是比較對等
07/14 11:49, 1F

07/14 11:50, , 2F
你仔細看看, 只有D 是化石對化石
07/14 11:50, 2F

07/14 11:50, , 3F
其他是恐龍對化石 or vice versa
07/14 11:50, 3F

07/14 11:54, , 4F
謝謝樓上的回答 可是我覺得B難道不能看成是恐龍對恐龍嗎
07/14 11:54, 4F

07/14 11:55, , 5F
你的they vs those 不就是恐龍對化石
07/14 11:55, 5F

07/14 12:24, , 6F
啊..我一直以為 這個those是跟著they的指代對象在變的
07/14 12:24, 6F

07/14 12:25, , 7F
those不能也指dinosaur嗎 真不好意思><
07/14 12:25, 7F

07/14 14:25, , 8F
those 指 dinosours的話 會變成dinosour of any
07/14 14:25, 8F

07/14 14:26, , 9F
similar dinosaur type 這樣不通呀(抱歉剛恐龍拼錯)
07/14 14:26, 9F

07/14 16:32, , 10F
found 前省略了which were 。B變成成恐龍活了這麼久的意
07/14 16:32, 10F

07/14 17:30, , 11F
謝謝以上諸位 但還想請教found若是which were found省略
07/14 17:30, 11F

07/14 17:32, , 12F
這樣逗號後面的fossils(at least...previously)不就少了
07/14 17:32, 12F

07/14 17:32, , 13F
動詞嗎??
07/14 17:32, 13F

07/14 21:36, , 14F
那裏不用動詞呀 就像I am older than you.
07/14 21:36, 14F

07/14 21:37, , 15F
those....type=上句中的you,previously...後是修飾語
07/14 21:37, 15F
文章代碼(AID): #18UiW3lW (GMAT)
文章代碼(AID): #18UiW3lW (GMAT)