Re: [語文] FeiFei-82

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者flac (老獅子)時間16年前 (2008/07/23 23:37)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

我的想法是這樣: 題目是在問這個結論的前提假設是啥不是在問結論本身所以你只能就題目給的結論去找出跟這結論有相關的東西其餘不相干的就不要弄進來 D提到的內容(可以把照片當做corroborative evidence等等)是多餘的因為在題目的結論中根本沒提到這點既然都沒扯到關於額外的證據等等資訊為何假設會有? 題目的結論只說到照片的sense都會有錯誤所以nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph. 所以你只能就五個答案中找出與這結論完全有關的選項不要去做其他過度的推論也不要誤把假設, 前提等當做結論來選如此就知道A這選項是最正確的了 ※ 引述《PINKENVI (是一條不歸路)》之銘言： : 82. Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits : hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could : always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot : express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing : can ever be definitively proved with a photograph. : Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion : above to be properly drawn? : A. Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth : cannot furnish definitive proof. : B. The whole truth cannot be known. : C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph : in any sense. : D. It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence : if there isadditional evidence establishing the truth about the scene : photographed. : E、If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove : definitively the truth about it : 恩。我現在在(A)和(D)之間掙扎。 : 答案是(A) : 這是assumption，大部分這類問題都是要取非。但是，如果D要從哪裡取非? : 那又要如何反駁題目?題目也是要取非嗎? : 我不太懂。請各位幫忙一下這類ASSUMPTION問題。 : 謝謝! -- No doubt, just keep walking -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.168.74.96