[語文] FeiFei-82

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (是一條不歸路)時間16年前 (2008/07/23 22:11), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
82. Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph. Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion above to be properly drawn? A. Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth cannot furnish definitive proof. B. The whole truth cannot be known. C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense. D. It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence if there isadditional evidence establishing the truth about the scene photographed. E、If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove definitively the truth about it 恩。我現在在(A)和(D)之間掙扎。 答案是(A) 這是assumption,大部分這類問題都是要取非。但是,如果D要從哪裡取非? 那又要如何反駁題目?題目也是要取非嗎? 我不太懂。請各位幫忙一下這類ASSUMPTION問題。 謝謝! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 218.160.101.50
文章代碼(AID): #18XplskN (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #18XplskN (GMAT)