[語文] pp1-cr2請教
Economist: On average, the emergency treatment for an elderly person for
injuries resulting from a fall costs $11,000. A new therapeutic program can
significantly reduce an elderly person's chances of falling. Though obviously
desirable for many reasons, this treatment program will cost $12,500 and thus
cannot be justified.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion of
the argument?
(A) Among elderly people who had followed the program for only a few months,
the number of serious falls reported was higher than it was for people
who had followed the program for its recommended minimum length of one
year.
(B) Falls resulting in serious injuries are less common among elderly people
living in nursing homes than they are among elderly people who live alone
at home.
(C) A frequent result of injuries sustained in falls is long-term pain,
medication for which is not counted among the average per-person costs of
emergency treatment for elderly people's injuries from such falls.
(D) The new therapeutic program focuses on therapies other than medication,
since overmedication can cause disorientation and hence increase the
likelihood that an elderly person will have a serious fall.
(E) A significant portion of the cost of the new therapeutic program is
represented by regular visits by health care professionals, the costs of
which tend to increase more rapidly than do those of other elements of
the program.
答案是c 實在看不懂咧 可否有高手解釋一下??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.4.234
※ 編輯: Moodys 來自: 140.112.4.234 (09/07 12:04)
推
09/07 13:50, , 1F
09/07 13:50, 1F
→
09/07 13:51, , 2F
09/07 13:51, 2F
GMAT 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章