[語文]PP1-CR-17

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者prettyting (get a food in the door)時間17年前 (2008/10/16 13:45)推噓2(2推 0噓 5→)

留言7則, 1人參與討論串1/1

At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase. The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that (A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available (B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals (C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering (D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer (E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall table 答案是C 已經看過CD、Formosa的討論串但仍有些許不確定想要請各位高手幫我確認下這樣解釋的邏輯有沒有錯誤~麻煩大家幫忙下!謝謝~ <題目大意> 高坐檯可以提供比較好的view來看名人，且坐高腳檯的客人用餐時間比做一般坐檯用餐的客人時間長，所以H餐廳決定增加高腳檯來增加利潤。 <我的解釋> C.選高腳檯的客人是普遍性逗留在H餐廳的例外 (選高腳檯的人並非用餐而是看名人，所以停留時間長；所以如果H餐廳增加高腳檯，雖然會使客人增加，但也會使客人逗留時間增加，餐廳流動率變小，所以餐廳利潤並不會應此增加)---->所以C選項反駁原文 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 60.245.116.133