Re: [語文] GWD-1-Q13

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者iammarsman (GMAT)時間17年前 (2009/01/11 01:13)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

※ 引述《iwsintupsy (愛人愛到紅了眼睛)》之銘言： : GWD1-Q13: : In the United States, of the people who moved from one state to another when : they retired, the percentage who retired to Florida has decreased by three : percentage points over the past ten years. Since many local businesses in : Florida cater to retirees, this decline is likely to have a noticeably : negative economic effect on these businesses. : Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? 先抓焦點:negative economic on retire businesses 反推因果:decline -> negative economic on retire businesses : A.Florida attracts more people who move from one state to another when they : retire than does any other state. 無關比較: 沒辦法反駁會有negative economic on retire businesses : B.The number of people who move out of Florida to accept employment in other : states has increased over the past ten years. : C.There are far more local businesses in Florida that cater to tourists than : there are local businesses that cater to retirees. : D.The total number of people who retired and moved to another state for : their retirement has increased significantly over the past ten years. 相對較好的答案，雖然還是有漏洞。舉個例就知啦, 1999:1,000人,去佛州有100人 -> 10% 2009:10,000人,去佛州有700人 -> 7% 誰多呢？漏洞在於如果2009只有1,200人,7%就只有84人, significantly到底是多多少沒人知道... : E.The number of people who left Florida when they retired to live in another : state was greater last year than it was ten years ago. : 我想請問 : (A)答案錯在哪? 是因為退休到Florida的人減少(題目) 和選項A的內容不合,所以錯嗎? : (D)為什麼對? : 可以麻煩知道的人回一下嗎 >//<" -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 203.73.57.58