Re: [語文] OG11 - CR38

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者JoshReddick (賈許)時間17年前 (2009/05/27 10:34)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

※ 引述《denizee3 (妮快瘋了!!!)》之銘言： : Companies O and P each have the same number of employees who work the : same number of hours per week.According to records maintained by each company, : the employees of Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than : did the employees of Company P. Therefore, employees of Company O are : less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees of Company P. : Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above? : (A) The employees of Company P lost more time at work due to job-related : accidents than did the employees of Company O. : (B) Company P considered more types of accidents to be job-related than : did Company O. : (C) The employees of Company P were sick more often than were the employees : of Company O. : (D) Several employees of Company O each had more than one job-related accident. : (E) The majority of job-related accidents at Company O involved a single : machine. : 答案是B, 我選C : 我看後面B選項的解釋我還是搞不懂為什麼答案是B OG上對B選項的解釋是overstate the number of job-related accidents 可以看出company P在accident types上認定過多不該認定的，所以overstate 事實上P的數量應該更低，搞不好比Q還低，所以weaken : 當初會選C是因為覺得反正都常常生病不在公司了當然意外發生的頻率相對會減少 : 看到後面的C選項解釋是可以免強接受 : 想要請問各位賢人是否有更好的解釋? : 謝謝! <(__ __)> 而C選項，題目是在討論number of job-related accidents， C選項討論的sick跟這並沒有關係，若硬去解釋，會犯了"過度推論"和"過於武斷"的錯誤，這在cr的錯誤選項常常可以看到。希望對你有幫助 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.169.78.34