Re: [語文] GWD21-Q30

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (all right)時間17年前 (2009/07/17 20:40), 編輯推噓1(100)
留言1則, 1人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
※ 引述《kenting15 (我不像我)》之銘言: : 30. GWD21-Q30: : In the past, most children who went sledding in the winter snow in Verland : used wooden sleds with runners and steering bars. Ten years ago, smooth : plastic sleds became popular; they go faster than wooden sleds but are harder : to steer and slow. The concern that plastic sleds are more dangerous is : clearly borne out by the fact that the number of children injured while : sledding was much higher last winter than it was ten years ago. : Which of the following, if true in Verland, most seriously undermines the : force of the evidence cited? : C. Plastic sleds can be used in a much wider variety of snow conditions than : wooden sleds can. : E.Because the traditional wooden sled can carry more than one rider, an : accident involving a wooden sled can result in several children being injured. : 我選E 答案是C : 但我想了很久還是不知道位何C可以weaken 這題用的是複因反駁 要注意的是題目第五行提到 "the number of children injured"比起十年前要多 答案給的是 因為塑膠雪橇比起木製雪橇可以在更多情況下使用 也因此使用的機會跟使用人數都會比較多 所以受傷的人數比較多也是合理的 並不表示是因為塑膠的比木製的危險 所以反駁了結論 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.42.62.160

07/18 09:55, , 1F
謝謝~!
07/18 09:55, 1F
文章代碼(AID): #1AO75PAE (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
1
1
文章代碼(AID): #1AO75PAE (GMAT)