[語文] GWD-TN3-Q30

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者denizee3 (妮)時間16年前 (2009/09/08 14:19)推噓3(3推 0噓 2→)

留言5則, 2人參與討論串1/1

30. Which of the following most logically completes the argument? The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage. However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods. For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain. Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking. However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______. A. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life B. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has C. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods D. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is E. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded Answer: E 是否可以請各位大大稍微解釋一下這題呢? 老實說我看不太懂..而且也不太清楚為什麼答案是E... 謝謝! -- 音樂史, 我永遠恨你.. (╯‵□′)╯︵ ┴─┴ -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 68.122.89.90