[語文] gwd7-Q27 邏輯

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (Bobshih)時間16年前 (2009/09/15 17:37), 編輯推噓2(202)
留言4則, 2人參與, 最新討論串1/1
A significant number of complex repair jobs carried out by Ace Repairs have to be reworked under the company's warranty. The reworked jobs are invariably satisfactory. When initial repairs are inadequate, therefore, it is not because the mechanics lack competence; rather, there is clearly a level of focused concentration that complex repairs require that is elicited more reliably by rework jobs than by first-time jobs. The argument above assumes which of the following? A. There is no systematic difference in membership between the group of mechanics who do first-time jobs and the group of those who do rework jobs. B. There is no company that successfully competes with Ace Repairs for complex repair jobs. C. Ace Repairs' warranty is good on first-time jobs but does not cover rework jobs. D. Ace Repairs does not in any way penalize mechanics who have worked on complex repair jobs that later had to be reworked. E. There is no category of repair jobs in which Ace Repairs invariably carries out first-time jobs satisfactorily. 答案A 不是很清楚理由是什麼 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.129.138.225

09/15 17:52, , 1F
做first-time和repair的成員必須要相同,才會確定不專心是否
09/15 17:52, 1F

09/15 17:52, , 2F
是主要原因!
09/15 17:52, 2F

09/15 17:54, , 3F
假如是不同一組人,那麼就有可能是因為兩組人員的程度不同
09/15 17:54, 3F

09/15 18:04, , 4F
謝謝 我懂了
09/15 18:04, 4F
文章代碼(AID): #1Ahs1onC (GMAT)
文章代碼(AID): #1Ahs1onC (GMAT)