Re: [寫作] 再一題AA

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (咕嚕咕嚕)時間16年前 (2009/10/11 10:53), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串3/3 (看更多)
1.financial interest的考量很多,不能光憑real estate的價格, 如果S地房地產上升的原因是因為經濟起飛,P地則是經濟下降, 那麼即使一開始成本房地價格低,但之後的收益也低,這樣無法達到profit 2.只有告訴我們這兩個地區real estate,卻沒有告訴我們其他條件是不是都一樣, 例如人口結構、城市機能the function of the city、交通便利、經濟能力等等, 這樣很難論斷誰比較好 3.說不定S城市再漲也超不過P城市,題目中沒有告訴我們漲之前的價格 ※ 引述《denizee3 (妮)》之銘言: : The following appeared in a letter from a part-owner of a small retail : clothing chain to her business partner: : “Commercial real estate prices have been rising steadily in the Sandida : Heights neighborhood for several years, while the prices in the adjacent : neighborhood of Palm Grove have remained the same. It seems obvious, then, : that a retail space in Sandida Heights must now be much more expensive than a : similar space in Palm Grove, which was not the case several years ago. So, : it appears that retail spaces in Sandida Heights are now overpriced relative : to those in Palm Grove. Therefore, it would be in our financial interest to : purchase a retail space in Palm Grove rather than in Sandida Heights.”) : 請問一下這題Argument可以從哪些論點下去反駁呢? : 謝謝! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 174.1.45.169 ※ 編輯: Diablotin 來自: 174.1.45.169 (10/11 10:56) ※ 編輯: Diablotin 來自: 174.1.45.169 (10/11 22:22)
文章代碼(AID): #1AqKYGhY (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1AqKYGhY (GMAT)