[CR. ] PP2-50 逃稅的惡性循環找假設還是找結論?

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者Bwk (阿元)時間15年前 (2010/08/31 10:15)推噓1(1推 0噓 5→)

留言6則, 4人參與討論串1/1

50. (33327-!-item-!-188;#058&007566) When people evade income taxes by not declaring taxable income, a vicious cycle results. Tax evasion forces lawmakers to raise income tax rates, which causes the tax burden on nonevading taxpayers to become heavier. This, in turn, encourages even more taxpayers to evade income taxes by hiding taxable income. The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true? (A) An increase in tax rates tends to function as an incentive for taxpayers to try to increase their pretax incomes. (B) Some methods for detecting tax evaders, and thus recovering some tax revenue lost through evasion, bring in more than they cost, but their success rate varies from year to year. (C) When lawmakers establish income tax rates in order to generate a certain level of revenue, they do not allow adequately for revenue that will be lost through evasion. (D) No one who routinely hides some taxable income can be induced by a lowering of tax rates to stop hiding such income unless fines for evaders are raised at the same time. (E) Taxpayers do not differ from each other with respect to the rate of taxation that will cause them to evade taxes. 答案是 (C) 不過我想問題意: The vicious cycle described above could not result unless which of the following were true? 請問這樣到底是在問產生逃稅之惡性循環的 assumption 還是 conclusion? The vicious cycle described above could not result UNLESS which of the following were true 照邏輯翻譯之後, 應該是: IF The vicious cycle described above "could" result THEN which of the following were true 所以是應該找結論嚕??? -- -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 211.21.104.32

[CR. ] PP2-50 逃稅的惡性循環 找假設還是找結論?

[CR. ] PP2-50 逃稅的惡性循環找假設還是找結論?