Re: [SC. ] PP1-95 "and so"

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (CM)時間15年前 (2010/09/10 22:24), 編輯推噓2(200)
留言2則, 2人參與, 最新討論串2/3 (看更多)
Google這篇文章第一句話,就可以搜到這題在Manhattan論壇的解釋。 也有人問過跟你一樣的問題,RonPurewal的說明,很值得參考。 << on official problems, CORRECT ANSWERS ARE CORRECT. the only way you can approach these things effectively is to say "oh, ok, i didn't know you could do that" and then add the example to your mental repository. since the question is official, it's a complete waste of your time to continue doubting it after you've verified that it's the OA. >> 就別把and so 當作判題點吧,應該有更明顯的結構性錯誤存在在別的選項。 ※ 引述《kernnel (沒有你的日記)》之銘言: : 95. (29661-!-item-!-188;#058&003962) : Unlike frogs that metamorphose from tadpoles into adults within : a one-year period, it takes three to four years for the mountain : yellow-legged frog of the Sierra Nevada to reach adulthood, and so : they are restricted to deeper bodies of water that do not dry up : in summer or freeze solid in winter. : (E) mountain yellow-legged frogs of the Sierra Nevada take three to four : years to reach adulthood, and so they are : 想請問兩個連接詞(and so)連用 S+V+O and so S+V+O : 這樣是否有redundancy? : 記得不知道在哪裡看過說這樣文法是錯誤的 但是PP1-95這題答案卻是(E) : 謝謝>_< -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 123.204.58.105 ※ 編輯: Belagua 來自: 123.204.58.105 (09/10 22:24)

09/11 00:00, , 1F
>_< 感激不盡 我開始刪除掉我這個判斷點了
09/11 00:00, 1F

09/11 00:05, , 2F
這個判題點還算不錯,等到無路可走再使用
09/11 00:05, 2F
文章代碼(AID): #1CYZ-2dx (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1CYZ-2dx (GMAT)