Re: [CR. ] PP-1-59

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者student7 (student)時間15年前 (2011/06/20 19:41)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

logical line: $5 fee (driving private vehicle is MORE EXPENSIVE than taking bus) >>> alleviate cogestion (plan works) what we gonna prove is whether "more expensive" really affects driver's decision. A tells nothing on HOW "more expensive" affects driver's decision. indeed,soaring gas price is the same thing as rising $5 fee. as i see here, this choice is like adding a fact, rather than weakening the argument. B gives you a fact that even though parking fees already make driving cost considerably higher, people still choose to drive private vehicles. obviously, "more expensive" does NOT work~ such fact reveals HOW "more expensive" affects the decision. ※ 引述《chances (definitely,maybe)》之銘言： : 59. A certain mayor has proposed a fee of five dollars per day on private : vehicles entering the city, claiming that the fee will alleviate the city's : traffic congestion. The mayor reasons that, since the fee will exceed the : cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points, many people will switch : from using their cars to using the bus. : Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that : the mayor's reasoning is flawed? : (A) Projected increases in the price of gasoline will increase the cost of : taking a private vehicle into the city. : (B) The cost of parking fees already makes it considerably more expensive for : most people to take a private vehicle into the city than to take a bus. : 正確答案為(B) : 但為什麼(A)不能選,油價增加了導致開私家車進城的成本也將會增加 : 這樣為什麼不對?? : 謝謝回答!! -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.168.173.228 ※ 編輯: student7 來自: 118.168.173.228 (06/20 19:44)