Re: OG12-CR-112

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者dounts (忘記過去)時間15年前 (2011/04/17 22:52)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)

※ 引述《chenemily (天天保持好心情)》之銘言： : The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been : significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped : all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of : televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent : statistics show a drop in the number of television assemblers in Borodia. : Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of : televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased. 前面廢話不多翻譯 1. the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed 2. a drop in the number of television assemblers in Borodia --> televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased B 市的電視數目售出量不變 + B 市的電視組裝工數目下滑 --> 從 V 進口的電視變多如果以數學式子來看我們應該說 B 市的電視數目售出量不變 + B 市的電視組裝工"組裝電視數目下滑" --> 從 V 進口的電視變多這樣的等式才合理所以作者做了一個 assumption 橋段 B 市的電視組裝工數目下滑 --> B 市的電視組裝廠商"組裝電視數目下滑" (C) 是指 B 市的電視組裝工做一台所需的時間沒有下滑的很快 --> 組裝效率沒成長很快，所以加強上述的 assumption 假設 : Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends? : (A)The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least : as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased. : (B)Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions : assembled in Borodia do not have. 題目壓根沒提到兩邊生產電視的 feature : (C)The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to : assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three : years. : (D)The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased : significantly during the past three years. V 市的電視生產量急遽上升這個很多人會選但 Assumption 畢竟不是 Support 題題目的論點是以 B 市的統計量判斷所以 Assumption 要以 B 市的觀點出發 : (E)The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in : Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to : decrease in the next few years. : 想請問這一題想的頭好暈阿@@" : 題目最後說因為在B地的 T.V assemblers 人數減少---> B地進口電視增加 : 題目前面又說在B地的電視數量不變 : 所以 B的總電視數量(不變)=B自己生產的(勢必要減少)+進口的(節論說增加) : (A) 無關比較 : (B) 這要怎麼說他錯阿? : (C) 取非, B地的工人效率減少,怎麼感覺是支持結論阿??? : (D) 取非,在V過去3年,電視數量沒有增加,既然沒有增加那好像反駁結論??? : (E) 薪資縮小,但還是跟題目一開始說的一樣 B>>V : 請問BCD該怎麼想大腦都打結了 : 感謝大家 -- GMAT、各金融證照資訊交流 - 勇闖夢想的新鮮人 http://ndxica.pixnet.net/blog -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.248.218.175