[問題] GWD-CR-6-14

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者 (天天保持好心情)時間13年前 (2012/07/30 12:16), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/3 (看更多)
GWD6-Q14: Political Advertisement: Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement? A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure. B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office. C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again. D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide. E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city. 請問一下 這題 就是要支持結論:在D的任期平均薪資提高 我對A & 正解D答案比較有點疑問 A說就說再過去3年平均薪資高過於再D執政的薪資 請問這題哪裡錯? 比過去高不就直接支持結論了 正解D 當初看了 就當作補充背景條件刪除了 請問該怎麼想 謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.85.211.79
文章代碼(AID): #1G5WgLMl (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
1
1
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):
1
1
文章代碼(AID): #1G5WgLMl (GMAT)