[問題] GWD-24-Q22
Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable, and thus do not require
surgery, are given follow-up x-rays because their orthopedists are concerned
about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When a number
of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had
initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore,
it is a waste of money to order follow-up
x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A. Doctors who are general practitioners rather than orthopedists are less
likely than orthopedists to judge the stability of an ankle fracture
correctly.
B. Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by
the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.
C. X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several
hospitals were reviewed.
D. The healing of ankle fractures that have been surgically repaired is
always checked by means of a follow-up x-ray.
E. Orthopedists routinely order follow-up x-rays for fractures of bone other
than ankle bones.
請問一下 這題結論就是要支持 再接受X-rays是浪費錢的
除正解B 其餘答案我都可以排除
可是B又說X光片被很多在不同醫院的醫生看過 可是也沒說結果
這樣感覺很像是補充說明 請問哪裡有支持?
謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.85.122.198
推
08/10 16:43, , 1F
08/10 16:43, 1F
→
08/10 18:36, , 2F
08/10 18:36, 2F
推
08/10 18:49, , 3F
08/10 18:49, 3F
GMAT 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章