Re: [SC. ] 請教板上大牛們句尾Ving的結構

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者dounts (忘記過去)時間13年前 (2013/04/10 10:36)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串2/2 (看更多)

※ 引述《ck901372 (孫臏)》之銘言： : 請教各位先進 : 句尾ing的結構到底要如何判斷是不是正確選項 : 有時有逗號有時沒逗號 : 有時答案要選which引導的子句有時又不用 : A2上課時有說邏輯主語可以跳回到主詞 : 也可以用句尾ing表達結果或形容整個句子 : 但是pp的語法筆記常寫會有表達歧異的問題 : 回答此類題目正確率不穩 : 實在是抓不太到感覺 : 麻請各位賜教謝謝一般來說 Ving 比 relative noun (關代) 來的好因為 Ving 修飾彈性較大可修飾前句主詞、動詞、或整句話而關代只能修飾相對位置最近的名詞但以下幾種情形要避免使用 Ving 1. 修飾對象為前面最近的名詞 (通常為受詞) OG12 - SC - #1 The Glass House Mountains in Queensland, Australia, were sighted in 1770 by the English navigator Captain James Cook, (by whom they were named supposedly because its) sheer wet rocks glistened like glass. (C) naming them supposedly since their (D) who so named them supposedly because their (Answer) 如果確定修飾對象為前面第一個名詞時關代比 Ving 好 OG 解釋(C) "James Cook does not work as the noun that the verbal phrase beginning with naming can describe;" 所以 OG 是認定用 Ving 時不容易指代到前面的名詞 (或受詞 James Cook) 2. 表達對比概念 OG13 - SC - #23 The Iroquois were primarily planters, (but supplementing) their cultivation of maize, squash, and beans with fishing and hunting. (A) but supplementing (D) although they supplemented (Answer) OG 解釋 (A) "The participle supplementing would normally be expected to modify the first clause, describing or extending its meaning, but the logic of this sentence demands a contrast, not an extension." 也就是說 Ving 有延伸句意的概念 (extending its meaning) 但碰到如此題的對比概念用 Ving 就是不好的方式應該改成對比的連接詞 (although or but) 所以對比概念 (although or but) + Ving 在 SC 裡面是不可接受的方式 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.36.69.252 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dounts GMAT 資訊小網站: http://ndxica.pixnet.net/blog ※ 編輯: dounts 來自: 114.36.69.252 (04/10 10:38)