Re: [CR. ] GWD-TN11-Q13

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者dounts (忘記過去)時間13年前 (2013/06/17 11:01)推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)

留言0則, 0人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)

※ 引述《happysister (...)》之銘言： : The traditional treatment of strep infections has been a seven-day : course of antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since : many patients stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is : common in cases where these drugs are prescribed. A new antibiotic requires : only a three-day course of treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably : be less common in cases where the new antibiotic is prescribed than in cases : where either penicillin or erythromycin is prescribed. : Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? : A. Some of people who are allergic to penicillin are likely to be allergic to : the new antibiotic. : B. A course of treatment with the new antibiotic costs about the same as : a course of treatment with either penicillin or erythromycin. : C. The new antibiotic has been shown to be effective in eradicating bacterial : infections other than strep. : D. Some physicians have already begun to prescribe the new antibiotic instead : of penicillin or erythromycin for the treatment of some strep infections : E. Regardless of whether they take a traditional antibiotic or the new one, : most patients feel fully recovered after taking the drug for three days. : 答案E : 這題雖然刪一刪到最後也只剩E,但我想問,E說不管新藥舊藥病人都可在三天內幾乎痊癒, : 這有違反題目嗎,因為文章中間不是有說道,他們用舊藥三天停藥會容易復發嗎?? : 這樣不就矛盾了請注意題目已經說過 stop taking "those drugs (P or E)" 會 reinfection 而 new antibiotic requires only a 3-day treatment 這部分並不是推測真實性不需去討論所以看到 "feel" 不管是字面還是邏輯上都可推得這只是感覺上而不是實際上的 recovered 以為自己 recovered 那病人三天之後都不會吃任何藥所以時效性短的 new antibiotic 當然是有效太多 support 無誤 -- Dounts GMAT 資訊網站: http://ndxica.pixnet.net/blog -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.248.225.138