CR 求救 GWD看不懂

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者chiao999 (chiao)時間7年前 (2017/07/08 21:40)推噓1(1推 0噓 2→)

留言3則, 1人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)

‧ Q10:TTGWD11-Q30: ‧ Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement. ‧ Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial? A. The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families. B. Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has. C. People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed. D. The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level. E. People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work. 翻譯: 失業者受到政府補助，為了降低失業率，政府打算補助那些願意接受比最低薪水還要低的人，雇主也能節省成本。但是，如果尚未就業的話，超過政府最低薪資不再享有補助，因此失業者沒有動機去接受那些低薪工作。削弱失業沒動機領低薪題目"However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed." 這修飾結構怎麼看怎麼翻都怪怪的 C選項:打算換新工作的人更傾向比失業的人拿到高薪這樣失業者不是沒動機拜託解惑一下謝謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.193.19.45 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/GMAT/M.1499521224.A.172.html ※ 編輯: chiao999 (123.193.19.45), 07/08/2017 21:43:28 ※ 編輯: chiao999 (123.193.19.45), 07/08/2017 21:46:28 ※ 編輯: chiao999 (123.193.19.45), 07/08/2017 23:23:02