Re: [問題] 請問一題CR

看板GMAT (GMAT入學考試)作者時間6年前 (2018/05/21 11:20), 6年前編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
※ 引述《Stumas (Fenway Park)》之銘言: : [CR] 請問一題 CR : Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable, and thus do not require : surgery, are given follow-up x-rays because their orthopedists are concerned : about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When a number : of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had : initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, : it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially : judged stable. : Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? : A. Doctors who are general practitioners rather than orthopedists are less : likely than orthopedists to judge the stability of an ankle fracture : correctly. : B. Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by : the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle. : C. X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several : hospitals were reviewed. : D. The healing of ankle fractures that have been surgically repaired is : always checked by means of a follow-up x-ray. : E. Orthopedists routinely order follow-up x-rays for fractures of bone other : than ankle bones. : (OA防雷) : 答案 (C),但我怎麼看好像跟題目都沒關聯性啊,有人可以解釋嗎? 這題最近正好有兩個同學問我 題目意思是: 骨折病人被診斷恢復正常的, 經過 X-Ray 進一步診斷之後,也是一樣正常的情形。 所以 X-Ray 是沒必要 (浪費錢) 的。 (C) X-Ray 的檢查包含了許多不同醫院的骨科醫生的報告 --> 此答案說明了題目樣本範圍是廣大的,說明樣本的客觀性 而不是侷限在少數或特殊的幾個 case 裡面 -- Donz GMAT 6~7 月實力班: http://www.donzgmat.com/course-5weeks Donz GMAT FB: https://www.facebook.com/groups/DonzGMAT Donz 全科線上機經課: http://ndxica.pixnet.net/blog/post/41525434 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.9.176.147 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/GMAT/M.1526872812.A.8CD.html ※ 編輯: ndxica (101.9.176.147), 05/21/2018 11:20:30
文章代碼(AID): #1R0ZhiZD (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1R0ZhiZD (GMAT)