Re: [問題] 出國念書..

看板PhD (博士班)作者lerudit (l'Erudit)時間19年前 (2006/01/05 00:14)推噓1(1推 0噓 0→)

留言1則, 1人參與討論串2/3 (看更多)

※ 引述《surfingdream (...)》之銘言： : 小弟原本打算碩士就出國念 : 結果大四推甄就上了T大 : 家裡人認為T大的文憑在台灣還算蠻有用,加上對於出國沒有那麼大的勇氣 : 所以就先在國內念了 : 不過未來還是希望出國深造 : 但是碩班念了一個學期左右 : 覺得自己的程度在T大只能算是中等 : 加上有門課老師說要像MIT看齊 : 期中考考下來,滿分115,全班平均20幾,只有幾個博班的及格 : 小弟也差不多考個跟平均一樣 : 信心實在摧殘殆盡 In fact, if lecturers do such job in EU, the university could send somebody to investigate them, once any of the student go to complain to the school. This will be taken very seriously, even for a professor. Therfore, this situation is hardly seen. This is the lecturer's problem. When you talk about education, no matter of which level, the points are how much the students can learn/remember after the class in a proper way. There is no point to stress the level should be the same as MIT or whatever, (You can also ask him a question, why just MIT?, why not NACA?) because this is not important at all. By the way, the lecturer might be doing some dirty jobs as well. Look at the grade structure. You want to pass, right? So, you all want the lecturer to adjust the final grade, right? And he must do this, definitely.... Then what will happen: those PhD would be definitely the first 20% or whatever and also get a grade more than 80 (after adjustment). Therefore, somebody could pass their QE by somehow... Anyway, I am just guessing. So, take it easy. : 越覺得自己在台灣都不怎樣了 : 出國念博士 : 會不會被電的超級慘 This is not a question to be asked here, because nobody can answer this except you. If you never try, you won't know as well. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 82.22.90.37 ※ 編輯: lerudit 來自: 82.22.90.37 (01/05 02:36)