Re: 博士班資格考

看板PhD (博士班)作者 (l'Erudit)時間19年前 (2006/01/04 02:13), 編輯推噓2(200)
留言2則, 2人參與, 最新討論串5/6 (看更多)
※ 引述《littlest (讀冊人...)》之銘言: : 沒錯 : 材料所是修課成績要兩門都要70%以上,或是一門50%另一門及格(兩門抵一科資格考) : 不過基本上修課對博班不會比較有利 : 因為會考試的都是碩一剛上來的,博班考試不會佔優勢 This is true and the real situation can be even worse. Just list some situations I have experienced or heard: 1. There are a lot of homework, and most of the students doing copy job. You are a good PhD student and you think you can do better than them. However, the situation is, good students might get lower grade... 2. Similar situations occurring at examinations, as previous post. There are a lot of problems copied from textbooks. All the master students know where they are except just some poor PhD students (less classmates or less playmates...). 3. Some guys cheat in the examinations successfully. You are a good and honest student with honour to God, so you don't. Unfortunately, the exam is very difficult... 4. The course leader is somebody's supervisor and unfortunately you are not in his group. The lecturer asks a lot of problems which are highly related to the basic knowledge in that group. This can be worse if he does want his students to bypass QE quickly (so publish more or do more work) or he encourages some of his students to change course to PhD from master. Some lecturers might want to attract more new PhD students to their group by offering this... 5. The course leader does good cover for his lots. No matter you believe or not. My friend complained to me that, in his department, there is a professor opening a course; his students, who also attended the course, made the mid-term and final examination sheets and marked those sheets including their own. All their guys got 9x, x>=5, while the others got something 72 +-2. I am sorry I cannot tell you any more details as I have promised somebody not to open those details any time anywhere. So, don't ask me about that. If you don't believe them, just don't believe me. That is OK. However, those made some of the main reasons of my disappointment about studying in Taiwan. I am not criticise anyone, but just try to notice more people to think more before you make your decisions. : 話說回來 : 我覺得台大材料所博士班資格考4科有一點多.... : ※ 引述《hantin0 (司馬特的水瓶)》之銘言: : : 有人問到112有些所可以用"good grade"來抵資格考 : : 也有人很羨慕修課可以抵資格考 : : 小弟就把聽到的跟大家報告一下 : : 我聽到的是應用力學所跟機械所 : : 修課要達到前三分之一 且八十分以上 : : 若人數太少<12 則是八十五以上 且前三分之一 : : 應力所資格考科目多半是必修 要跟碩班以及很閑又很優秀的大四生競爭 : : 其實很多人也是過不了 要用考的 只是修課拼資格考似乎多了點機會 : : 而碩班必修當太多會退學的 所以碩班在修課也是很拼 : : 這樣的抵資格考壓力似乎減輕一些 不過聽說也不好過就是了 : : 有說錯的話 請各位指正 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 82.22.90.37 ※ 編輯: lerudit 來自: 82.22.90.37 (01/04 02:59)

01/04 13:35, , 1F
為何您不打中文呢?
01/04 13:35, 1F

01/05 18:50, , 2F
It is free to use English here.
01/05 18:50, 2F
文章代碼(AID): #13khwjTR (PhD)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #13khwjTR (PhD)