Re: [期刊] 嗚...英文寫作有那麼差嗎?

看板PhD (博士班)作者 (洋為中用)時間19年前 (2006/12/30 16:32), 編輯推噓1(103)
留言4則, 2人參與, 最新討論串2/3 (看更多)
其實我納悶的是,editor沒有針對我寫的內容批評,而是只針對 writing, gramma & exposition.....這真的有點讓人覺得鬱卒。 彷彿寫的完全狗屁不通,連翻都不想翻直接退回。 或是,他覺得水準不夠、風格不匹配該期刊,而間接以其他理由退回? 後來,我直接回信去問editor-in-chief,他的回答一串,但讓我摸不著 頭緒、看不到問題...... (以下是編輯回應,各未能幫我看一下嗎....他到底說啥?) I (and one of the associate editors) identified yours manuscript as one where the presentation is likely to be a serious problem. There is no hidden meaning and any attempts to read "between the lines" is probably not going to be very useful. There is also no judgment on our part about the quality of the research. If you do revise it and resubmit it, then I will forward it to an associate editor but I cannot, of course, promise you anything about the outcome of the review process. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 125.229.166.206

12/30 22:32, , 1F
yours manuscript?
12/30 22:32, 1F

12/31 19:05, , 2F
還是別鐵尺了吧,通常會被editor寫成這樣應該是
12/31 19:05, 2F

12/31 19:06, , 3F
英文部分真的有很大的問題,還是找個專家好好修改
12/31 19:06, 3F

12/31 19:07, , 4F
才是王道
12/31 19:07, 4F
文章代碼(AID): #15bYGRYD (PhD)
文章代碼(AID): #15bYGRYD (PhD)