Re: [Work] Does an efficient leader need higher …
Do you think that autocracy is equal to immoral?
I think that a autocratic leader may still be moral and have virtues.
You mention that morality is a factor of winning trust and power, and
whether a man is an efficient leader depends on his management abilities.
However, I still remain confused about why a virtuous person is more likely
to be an efficient leader?
Is it because the more virtuous a person is, the more power he could obtain,
and thus that enables him to be an effective leader?
※ 引述《philJamy (Jamy)》之銘言：
: To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest
: ethical and moral standards.
: ==================================================================
: A leader is effective only if he can make policies into practice. Under this
: definition, I agree to the extent that with high ethical standards, it may be
: easier for a leader to execute his policies effectively. However, being a
: great leader without high moral values is still possible, as long as one can
: achieve his goal.
: Take my nation, Taiwan, for example. Decades ago people in Taiwan had an
: autarchical government. Though everyone knew that many public servants and
: officials are corruptible, most of the important national fundamental
: constructions were finished then. Up to now, the influences of these
: constructions are still explicit. Besides, there were not so many crimes and
: violence affairs as now. These are the evidences supporting the idea that
: one could be a great leader without being morally respected.
: Turing to the recent presidential competition, the poll showed that people
: concern more about economy issues than the moral issues of the candidates.
: A public official has the responsibility to make the nation move forward,
: while obeying the moral rules is the responsibility of the public. Compared
: with a moderate gentleman who is not capable of public affairs, a man with
: the management ability is a better candidate of an efficient leader.
: To me, a higher moral standard is just a way to gain voters’ trust. A
: politician without scandals is more likely to win the election than a
: corruptionist. Though having good morals does not necessary imply that he’s
: a great leader, people tend to confide the power to him. They believe that a
: man with ethical merit is the right leader to lead the country in the right
: direction. For any leader, winning the trust of his people is essential for
: enforcing his leadership. Virtuous leaders are thus advantageous.
: On balance, moral virtue is neither a sufficient nor a necessary
: condition to be an efficient leader. At most, I agree that a highly virtuous
: person is more likely to be an efficient leader. On the contrary, one could
: govern a country efficiently without being moral.
: 這是我上錸心補習班，有個寫作老師出的題目，應該是GRE的。
: 在這裡獻醜，希望可以和大家討論 :)
: ※ 編輯: philJamy 來自: 210.243.27.1 (06/13 14:14)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 211.74.176.185
討論串 (同標題文章)
ST-English 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章
