Re: [新聞] AI熱潮像龐氏騙局!傳奇投資人警告「一訊號」:泡沫將慘烈收場

看板Stock (股票)作者 (プロ)時間55分鐘前 (2026/04/29 15:14), 編輯推噓13(13010)
留言23則, 20人參與, 7分鐘前最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
他不是第一次這樣了 Wiki上面找到的資料: By September 2010, Hussman managed US$6.7 billion. However, between 2013 and 2 017, he became increasingly bearish, asserting that the "quantitative easing" ("QE") and zero interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve had contributed to a “hypervalued market”,[6] Hussman's investment performance suffered as a result, and he was labeled a “permabear”. His performance during this perio d sharply lagged the S&P 500, in contrast to the years prior to 2013. By late- 2017, assets under management had declined to US$1 billion. Hussman has regula rly commented on his error during that period,[7] tracing it to his insistence on stress-testing his methods against Depression-era data following the 2008 financial crisis, which led him to emphasize the importance of “overvalued, o verbought, overbullish” conditions that had historically been reliable indica tions of market tops.[8] In late-2017, he gave up, saying "Evidently, once int erest rates hit zero, so did the collective IQ of Wall Street" 到 2010 年 9 月,Hussman 管理的資產達到 67 億美元。然而在 2013 到 2017 年之間 ,他的看法變得越來越悲觀,主張美國聯準會的「量化寬鬆」(QE)與零利率政策造成了 「高度估值的市場」。因此他的投資績效受到影響,被貼上「永久空頭」(permabear) 的標籤。這段期間他的表現大幅落後 S&P 500,與 2013 年之前的亮眼成績形成對比。到 2017 年底,他的管理資產已下降至 10 億美元。 Hussman 多次評論自己在那段時間的錯誤,將原因追溯到 2008 年金融危機後,他堅持用 大蕭條時期的資料對模型進行壓力測試,讓他過度強調「高估值、過度買進、過度樂觀」 這些在歷史上通常代表市場見頂的訊號。 2017 年底,他放棄了這種做法,並表示:「顯然,一旦利率降到零,華爾街的集體智商 也跟著歸零了。」 就是輸了還要嘴砲的那種 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.129.121 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Stock/M.1777446859.A.AA2.html

04/29 15:16, 54分鐘前 , 1F
連我60歲的媽媽都會AI到底怎麼泡沫
04/29 15:16, 1F

04/29 15:16, 54分鐘前 , 2F
總有一次會矇中
04/29 15:16, 2F

04/29 15:20, 50分鐘前 , 3F
悲觀主義才能得道鎂光燈
04/29 15:20, 3F

04/29 15:21, 49分鐘前 , 4F
定期發作
04/29 15:21, 4F

04/29 15:22, 48分鐘前 , 5F
我懂了 跟某位老蘇一樣
04/29 15:22, 5F

04/29 15:24, 46分鐘前 , 6F
做空聰明人,做多有錢人
04/29 15:24, 6F

04/29 15:28, 42分鐘前 , 7F
就跟富爸爸一樣 一直猜 總有一天會中
04/29 15:28, 7F

04/29 15:29, 41分鐘前 , 8F
大家都在用怎麼泡沫
04/29 15:29, 8F

04/29 15:30, 40分鐘前 , 9F
投入跟產出差距懸殊現在有可能 但這是泡沫?
04/29 15:30, 9F

04/29 15:33, 37分鐘前 , 10F
麻煩他輸了就乖乖閉嘴,贏了再來嘴炮,不然既可悲
04/29 15:33, 10F

04/29 15:33, 37分鐘前 , 11F
又可憐。
04/29 15:33, 11F

04/29 15:37, 33分鐘前 , 12F
好可憐
04/29 15:37, 12F

04/29 15:37, 33分鐘前 , 13F
AI是真的 但他來說是BI
04/29 15:37, 13F

04/29 15:38, 32分鐘前 , 14F
以後像電信月租費,每人都要交
04/29 15:38, 14F

04/29 15:38, 32分鐘前 , 15F
老一輩的被時代拋棄後就不甘心啊
04/29 15:38, 15F

04/29 15:42, 28分鐘前 , 16F
大家都免費仔賺不了錢!?
04/29 15:42, 16F

04/29 15:47, 23分鐘前 , 17F
就是直接忽略實業與技術的進步 天天鑽資金面的牛角
04/29 15:47, 17F

04/29 15:48, 22分鐘前 , 18F
說 你看 形狀這麼像 一定是過度樂觀啦 484這意思
04/29 15:48, 18F

04/29 15:48, 22分鐘前 , 19F
94這個意思 67億到10億以下也算是反向傳奇
04/29 15:48, 19F

04/29 15:49, 21分鐘前 , 20F
連我80歲老母每天玩AI做早安圖 你跟我說泡沫
04/29 15:49, 20F

04/29 15:51, 19分鐘前 , 21F
米國嘉偉喔,真可憐
04/29 15:51, 21F

04/29 15:56, 14分鐘前 , 22F
AI要泡沫大概是它自我覺醒砍翻人類?
04/29 15:56, 22F

04/29 16:03, 7分鐘前 , 23F
跟AI比起來,加密幣還比較像騙局
04/29 16:03, 23F
文章代碼(AID): #1fyQ_BgY (Stock)
文章代碼(AID): #1fyQ_BgY (Stock)